From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrei Kuznetsov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 21:38:35 +0800 Message-ID: <8735rysgmc.fsf@163.com> References: <8735rzyzbz.fsf@163.com> <86v94v3xh9.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <87o8amy88o.fsf@163.com> <20210728123612.pr2ddrf6vmynknxn@Ergus> <877dhawpr7.fsf@163.com> <83mtq6tw7v.fsf@gnu.org> <87eebish4g.fsf@163.com> <83h7getvgi.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1772"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: spacibba@aol.com, stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 28 15:39:54 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m8jmr-00009c-2U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 15:39:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36498 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m8jmo-0001QG-W1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 09:39:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49792) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m8jlx-0000kY-Pe for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 09:38:57 -0400 Original-Received: from m12-17.163.com ([220.181.12.17]:48408) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m8jlu-0007us-90; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 09:38:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=163.com; s=s110527; h=From:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; bh=8wOsV JOy5QzrTok3ackq8+MAf+sbGnA/EPhvX9dzwjY=; b=mZEv5aHVHAWx6f7cU+ZuX irL1uFj770RvWCqZhw+h5Xzt87oCPNiI+YI0PytKHhN64ShDBZN8L8/lJyfXJCGq q8T4hI8q/zHCpDh/rAr5QpMDn3vX+Auvs9VeKCjTa4f/DjgDnW1AJLuPU+RZEOOW GNIc37v4N6lKcpWD/Q92EE= Original-Received: from po-lus-librem-15 (unknown [61.172.31.87]) by smtp13 (Coremail) with SMTP id EcCowADn1HzcXQFhuv7tDA--.27500S2; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 21:38:36 +0800 (CST) In-Reply-To: <83h7getvgi.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 28 Jul 2021 16:32:45 +0300") X-CM-TRANSID: EcCowADn1HzcXQFhuv7tDA--.27500S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjvdXoWrKw4xCF4DGFWrGF4UGFW7urg_yoWxAFg_ur yxAr4xG3Z5Ka97Aay7KF1YkrWfZryjvrW2vFZ3KryvvryfXF45GFW8Z3Z3ZFW3JFWDur47 GasYvanFg34S9jkaLaAFLSUrUUUUUb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7IU020PDUUUUU== X-Originating-IP: [61.172.31.87] X-CM-SenderInfo: rurskkarusmjiyx6il2tof0z/xtbBQhzdpF++MszRdQAAsc Received-SPF: pass client-ip=220.181.12.17; envelope-from=r12451428287@163.com; helo=m12-17.163.com X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_LOCAL_DIGITS=0.001, FROM_LOCAL_HEX=0.006, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:271742 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > If you are talking about affecting how TS does lexical analysis for > some language, then I see no reason why we in the Emacs project would > want to do that. We don't _want_ to develop parsers if we can use > parsers available out there. Lexical analysis of a parser is > determined by the language it parses, so you need only to change the > parser when the language changes, or to fix a bug. Both are part of > the job of the TS developers, so there should be no need for us to get > busy with that. Exactly like we do with other libraries we use that > aren't developed as part of the Emacs project. Okay, thanks for the clarification