From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Adam Porter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Supporting newer Emacs features in older Emacs versions without warnings? Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 01:08:49 -0500 Message-ID: <8735pucxou.fsf@alphapapa.net> References: <87ee9gjc4p.fsf@alphapapa.net> <87zgs3hdm6.fsf@tcd.ie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11644"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 24 08:09:57 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mTePF-0002q0-6W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 08:09:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52860 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mTePE-0002W1-9B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 02:09:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55976) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mTeOQ-0001p8-0Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 02:09:06 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:59788) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mTeOK-0001no-M1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 02:09:05 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mTeOI-0001kE-55 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 08:08:58 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:275381 Archived-At: "Basil L. Contovounesios" writes: > Adam Porter [2021-09-22 20:48 -0500] wrote: > >> Is there a cleaner way to do this? > > Here's what I do, FWIW: > > (with-eval-after-load 'shortdoc > (declare-function shortdoc-add-function "shortdoc" (group section elem)) > (mapc > (pcase-lambda (`(,section . ,elems)) > (dolist (elem elems) > (setq elem `(,(car elem) :no-manual t ,@(cdr elem))) > (shortdoc-add-function 'foo section elem))) > '(("Frobnicating" > (foo-frobnicate > :no-eval (foo-frobnicate) > :eg-result-string "...") > ...) > ("Bifurcating" > (foo-bifurcate > :no-eval (foo-bifurcate) > :eg-result "...") > ...) > ...))) Hi Basil, Thanks, that does seem to produce fewer warnings in older Emacs versions. (Of course, package-lint complains about using with-eval-after-load outside of user configuration, but that's not Emacs's fault.)