From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "C-x 5 5" vs "C-x 4 1" inconsistency Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2021 11:10:50 +0300 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <8735p9jo51.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <83zgriwnv2.fsf@gnu.org> <83wnmmwnn3.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16582"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 10 10:26:28 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mZUA7-00048l-Qn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 10:26:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58028 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mZUA6-0001vp-Rb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 04:26:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42966) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mZU8K-0007Uo-AO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 04:24:36 -0400 Original-Received: from relay12.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.232]:56131) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mZU8F-0006Qk-UJ; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 04:24:36 -0400 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by relay12.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A72F4200004; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 08:24:28 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <83wnmmwnn3.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 09 Oct 2021 12:30:56 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.178.232; envelope-from=juri@linkov.net; helo=relay12.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:276643 Archived-At: >> I think this inconsistency is unfortunate and unjustified. Can we >> please move same-window-prefix to "C-x 4 5" for consistency with the >> equivalent frame command? > > Sorry, I meant "C-x 4 4" and other-window-prefix. Please explain where do you think is inconsistency. 'C-x 4 4' is already bound to 'other-window-prefix'.