From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 6e5d79c048: Display show-paren-context-when-offscreen in child frame Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 07:59:39 +0100 Message-ID: <8735ktzve1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <164414267475.11015.16458968298391656164@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20220206101755.0EC03C002F9@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <871r0f7k6u.fsf@gnus.org> <87czjzlb1h.fsf@yahoo.com> <877da79p7y.fsf@gnu.org> <87wni6cev3.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10190"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.7.7; emacs 29.0.50 Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 08 08:50:29 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nHLGe-0002Wk-Hd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 08:50:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35800 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHLGd-0004OD-8m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 02:50:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51576) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHKdo-0006RE-SG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 02:10:30 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=51248 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHKdo-00007m-1h; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 02:10:20 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-reply-to:Date:Subject:To:From: References; bh=HwDMkWRwLio9v6RzsGymfNcLm0ocDjDoZ2ABLNir5cU=; b=nnObPVMKwDXIQj lrxJH6soB2azfnDpjtZA2Qkc+VmCRAPgH9RNYMjAHR6WgvT1u6CKFl+2AJW/kfdVTM9M4JaYkMORn Fe+guVG3omhxtJXRStAcXJw4MUskSKxLE2fGl1sgPYv+uKF3W+jVl6pBGSBjlilNP+baT+tLJghJ5 bWuV8THSPzhhGRVeG6XLLNqVCp7kuewwbplNfmNgOuj81fJGDEU+/GocsoLG2NoSZgIbkdzzo5jsx +M/yj6pZOIeRA7HvNcvdocIpgGZu7cgdEN8m3ru7h66VnziyP5Oz3SVgHWORYMWBsFwKK3SINQmlq WTdmcSy8/2exDaReDMbg==; Original-Received: from auth2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.228]:54057) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHKdl-0004TA-KZ; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 02:10:19 -0500 Original-Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailauth.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F4127C0054; Tue, 8 Feb 2022 02:10:17 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 08 Feb 2022 02:10:17 -0500 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddrheeigddutdefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfhgfhffvufffjgfkgggtsehttdertddtredtnecuhfhrohhmpefvrghsshhi lhhoucfjohhrnhcuoehtshguhhesghhnuhdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepve evieekteekveeigfefffeivdetgeduvdffueeuudevgedttdehvdfhueevfffhnecuvehl uhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhrnhdomh gvshhmthhprghuthhhphgvrhhsohhnrghlihhthidqkeeijeefkeejkeegqdeifeehvdel kedqthhsughhpeepghhnuhdrohhrghesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdhfmh X-ME-Proxy: Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 8 Feb 2022 02:10:16 -0500 (EST) In-reply-to: <87wni6cev3.fsf@yahoo.com> X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:286065 Archived-At: Po Lu writes: > BTW, I think there are at least two open bug reports about slow child > frames on PGTK, one from after it was merged, and one from before. > > I can't find the latter, so someone should find and merge those. > Thanks in advance. I've tried but only found this one: bug#52677: 29.0.50; make-frame-visible/invisible too slow when use --with-pgtk Anyhow, I think being able to toggle a frame's visibility state on/off only ten times a second isn't so horrible slow. Of course, it depends on use-case. But for show-paren where there's `show-paren-delay' anyhow it doesn't really matter from my POV. FWIW, I don't have posframe installed but tried this benchmark which is quite similar: (benchmark 10 '(show-paren--show-context-in-child-frame "foobar")) ;Elapsed time: 1.178163s (0.047553s in 3 GCs) Bye, Tassilo