From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [elpa] externals/auctex cb0a1e6be1 72/77: Improve function calls to retrieve key=vals in style hooks Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2022 00:51:49 +0200 Message-ID: <8735dipqii.fsf@dataswamp.org> References: <166154439039.10036.933483657788018296@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20220826200639.2B668C00889@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20438"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:CcM/PbtKqhHuN9jfOAVfrv90Nks= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 27 00:52:39 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oRiBr-0005AF-Lf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 27 Aug 2022 00:52:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38006 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oRiBq-0002Qf-11 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 18:52:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60696) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oRiBG-0001jv-RB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 18:52:02 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:55970) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oRiBF-0004oV-0o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 18:52:02 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oRiBA-0004LB-Sf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Aug 2022 00:51:56 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:294169 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: > replacing `apply` with `eval` is not an "Improve"ment in my > book :-) What does it say about replacing `apply' with `funcall' then? Does it say you should do it since `funcall' is not only shorter but also more efficient? But not always or not always possible to do, right? -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal