From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-30 768e92b9c02: Update options that depend on 'which-key-dont-use-unicode' Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 13:40:14 +0000 Message-ID: <8734oepw3l.fsf@posteo.net> References: <171921519771.16563.15139426619834982564@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20240624074638.294E1C1FB6E@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <875xtybedy.fsf@gmail.com> <87tthi2xmj.fsf@posteo.net> <871q4mb6w6.fsf@gmail.com> <87jzie2n20.fsf@posteo.net> <87bk34i7wk.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15902"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 12 15:41:23 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sSGWY-0003vW-HV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 15:41:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sSGVg-0004GE-IG; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 09:40:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sSGVe-00049Y-UV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 09:40:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sSGVa-0000hG-J3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 09:40:25 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8C38240101 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 15:40:15 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1720791615; bh=YEdYFcK61ChrUjOMC82fS19stShIHYD2/V/fPygWSFs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:OpenPGP:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From; b=nPNXqyT/5qK7BeQwrbv5m1zS1wuPu2Mh6ZlLwZbJkI9AXburZHEEkb3oiPZnyH4cQ n/eB1zweYF9JflrG+EdN9CtLK6aTUpDX/TS4G1/BRnv48fuvEejWp7Z7neOgbugAKU txf4BqLZ1Q7lX+WWGaSw3Kmu7pBQYdaf4/lw5UqVUOEsl3yJWg5vnjYlXqlZkmsnPg dDuLsKgJInGmXOdOpeney46GX5+qFUDV82RVSW/GkDR1koaFQa9bkoCeCk7SUwn/3y qhp1ib45w4s6kAoH1TrIklRJ1ghoqNBqz4dnhtRZ0ec4ePD8xxa9mdPrxVSB8zXQIr zzyvVs/lNP0/w== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4WLCQR2Mj9z6tvq; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 15:40:14 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87bk34i7wk.fsf@gmail.com> (Robert Pluim's message of "Thu, 11 Jul 2024 11:40:11 +0200") OpenPGP: id=7126E1DE2F0CE35C770BED01F2C3CC513DB89F66; url="https://keys.openpgp.org/vks/v1/by-fingerprint/7126E1DE2F0CE35C770BED01F2C3CC513DB89F66"; preference=signencrypt Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:321596 Archived-At: Robert Pluim writes: >>>>>> On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 18:49:43 +0000, Philip Kaludercic said: > >> That works for me, although I won=CA=BCt claim to understand why = =F0=9F=98=80 > > Philip> My reasoning is that this will only run the setter if the val= ue is > Philip> /changed/, right? So if we set `which-key-dont-use-unicode' = is set > Philip> before we load which-key, then the user option inherits the > Philip> configuration and the other two options use the current value= to > Philip> determine their default value. If on the other hand we chang= e the user > Philip> option after which-key has been loaded, then the custom sette= r will take > Philip> effect, and will re-load the default value, which has previou= sly been > Philip> set to the (if ...) expression, as was the case before. > > I spoke too soon, or my testing was wrong, I=CA=BCm still getting > `which-key-separator' as nil when I customize > `which-key-dont-use-unicode' to nil in emacs-30. > > Do you want a M-x report-emacs-bug? I think that would make sense. > Robert --=20 Philip Kaludercic on peregrine