From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jonas Bernoulli Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Adding git-commit highlight mode? Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2025 18:20:51 +0100 Message-ID: <8734hyijgs.fsf@bernoul.li> References: <37733be4476e1c2b6e873c967c79cb0035959a9e.camel@yandex.ru> <083310b3-a288-5c75-c835-84595e134682@gmail.com> <56c9eadd95367cd3fd7c8414dc3e86b243a4b3d7.camel@yandex.ru> <87sepyeo9t.fsf@bernoul.li> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21568"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Jim Porter , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn?= Bidar , Konstantin Kharlamov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 04 18:38:39 2025 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tU86g-0005Q5-F6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 18:38:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tU85u-0003qG-KZ; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 12:37:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tU7pe-0007zb-EY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 12:21:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([212.243.197.30]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tU7pb-0006vX-Bd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 12:21:02 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3800D164B1; Sat, 4 Jan 2025 18:20:55 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=bernoul.li; h= content-type:content-type:mime-version:message-id:date:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:subject:from:from; s=sel2011a; t=1736011254; bh=/mVrSivtSEqp/rZC+g9+QUwGKQepIyM6lee5vkqFZlQ=; b= GhDC8zDPs7gOQkB5cWg2vK/zmVCtyuhSNo2y8m1U01007ex5llHIwXWM1Sk1qTYm 55k+vc0ny86FFsJLaskZ0v9DpVaj/iql2K0sqannvfxCjePQVObdpfSmeeqzVHk6 bQa8Yb9Xj+a3Z1xHg/2bDdOYnc2PvZuUbEGilBDVhHY= X-Virus-Scanned: by Hostpark/NetZone Mailprotection at hostpark.net Original-Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail0.hostpark.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id KhuQBx9peQzd; Sat, 4 Jan 2025 18:20:54 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 182DC1648A; Sat, 4 Jan 2025 18:20:53 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87sepyeo9t.fsf@bernoul.li> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.243.197.30; envelope-from=jonas@bernoul.li; helo=mail.hostpark.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 04 Jan 2025 12:37:46 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:327675 Archived-At: Jonas Bernoulli writes: > 5. Support for cycling through past messages. This is based on similar > functionality in log-edit.el. It might be best to just port the > improvements to that built-in library. I've done that see https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=+75355.