From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-trunk-diffs] Changes to emacs/lisp/faces.el Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 02:22:57 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <871xda6jha.fsf@jurta.org> References: <87mzwsws3d.fsf@jurta.org> <41B6317B.6020303@esperanto.org> <41BC0D29.9020007@t-online.de> <87sm5wfhh3.fsf@jurta.org> <87ekhcsurb.fsf@jurta.org> <01c4ebea$Blat.v2.2.2$4d937300@zahav.net.il> <87r7lbikl4.fsf@jurta.org> <01c4ec5f$Blat.v2.2.2$d17a06a0@zahav.net.il> <87fz1r9j5x.fsf@jurta.org> <01c4ec98$Blat.v2.2.2$7de106e0@zahav.net.il> <87k6r3ynqg.fsf@jurta.org> <01c4ed1d$Blat.v2.2.2$0c9a74a0@zahav.net.il> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1104280054 12723 80.91.229.6 (29 Dec 2004 00:27:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 00:27:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bob@rattlesnake.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 29 01:27:27 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CjRgV-0002e1-00 for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 01:27:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CjRrN-0001sY-OC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 19:38:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CjRr7-0001rR-KD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 19:38:25 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CjRr5-0001qR-DO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 19:38:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CjRr5-0001pe-As for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 19:38:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [194.126.101.98] (helo=MXR-4.estpak.ee) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CjReZ-0004j5-QN; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 19:25:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.neti.ee (80-235-33-132-dsl.mus.estpak.ee [80.235.33.132]) by MXR-4.estpak.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id C554110B3E2; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 02:25:18 +0200 (EET) Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: <01c4ed1d$Blat.v2.2.2$0c9a74a0@zahav.net.il> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 28 Dec 2004 22:36:20 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) (Debian) at neti.ee X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:31549 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:31549 "Eli Zaretskii" writes: >> > I think blue and green do not stand out on 8-color terminals as much >> > as the red color. >> >> Blue and green are no less noticeable than red. > > They are noticable, but less annoying. If you say that red is more annoying, then I agree. And I don't like that comments are highlighted in red. But when ^L will be highlighted in red too, then it will be less noticeable since it will look like comment. -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/