From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [christopher.ian.moore@gmail.com: Emacs very slow opening file] Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2005 10:48:49 -0400 Message-ID: <871x34j7pp.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> References: <20050929095157.GA6233@kenny.sha-bang.local> <85vf0j6our.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1128264730 12527 80.91.229.2 (2 Oct 2005 14:52:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2005 14:52:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: wilde@sha-bang.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 02 16:52:08 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EM5BP-0006PZ-PD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 16:51:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EM5BP-0006ZC-9M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 10:51:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EM59G-0005ve-2v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 10:49:09 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EM59C-0005tc-G0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 10:49:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EM59B-0005lk-Ae for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 10:49:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.25] (helo=tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EM597-0006Gj-Qq; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 10:48:58 -0400 Original-Received: from alfajor ([70.49.82.228]) by tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP id <20051002144851.ZSGU26967.tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net@alfajor>; Sun, 2 Oct 2005 10:48:51 -0400 Original-Received: by alfajor (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4D329D780A; Sun, 2 Oct 2005 10:48:49 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Richard M. Stallman's message of "Fri, 30 Sep 2005 19:50:56 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:43456 Archived-At: > When Emacs is running diff itself, it could start the output off with > an appropriate -*- type string overriding a possible local variables > block. Or it could append a solitary ^L to the output (which is the > normal way of telling Emacs not to look further backward for a local > variables section). > That would work. Except that most diff/patch files are not generated by Emacs. Stefan