Re: "Non-nil means" versus "On means" in docstrings

[Bill Wohler <wohler@newt.com>]

Bill Wohler <wohler@newt.com> writes:

> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> > Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 15:29:59 -0700
>> > From: Bill Wohler <wohler@newt.com>
>> > 
>> >  	     ;; If the variable has -flag in the name, make sure
>> >  	     (if (and (string-match "-flag$" (car fp))
>> > -		      (not (looking-at "\"\\*?Non-nil\\s-+means\\s-+")))
>> > +		      (not (looking-at
>> > +                            "\"\\*?\\(Non-nil\\|On\\)\\s-+means\\s-+")))
>> >  		 (checkdoc-create-error
>> >  		  "Flag variable doc strings should usually start: Non-nil means"
>> >  		  s (marker-position e) t))
>> 
>> I don't have a strong opinion about this, but IMHO if we allow "On" as
>> well as "Non-nil", the message displayed if none of them is used
>> should mention both possibilities.  You suggest to modify the code,
>> but not the message.
>
> I would be happy to modify the message too.

As well as (elisp) Documentation Tips.

-- 
Bill Wohler <wohler@newt.com>  http://www.newt.com/wohler/  GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian!
If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.