From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: M-g in dired Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 14:43:31 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <871x1r1g70.fsf@jurta.org> References: <873bnf36mr.fsf@jurta.org> <878xwap86u.fsf@jurta.org> <8764rcye8k.fsf@jurta.org> <877jbqmrbc.fsf@jurta.org> <87r79xzsl5.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <87zmok96ry.fsf@jurta.org> <87pspfa8ig.fsf@jurta.org> <87k6fku51c.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1131461531 23635 80.91.229.2 (8 Nov 2005 14:52:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:52:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 08 15:52:09 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EZUlh-0003TM-JL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 15:48:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EZUlg-0005qt-T7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 09:48:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EZTPw-0004L5-Cu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 08:21:40 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EZTPq-0004C5-5V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 08:21:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EZTPk-000426-HE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 08:21:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [194.126.101.111] (helo=mail.neti.ee) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EZTPj-0001Ot-JK; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 08:21:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.neti.ee (80-235-37-183-dsl.mus.estpak.ee [80.235.37.183]) by Relayhost1.neti.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B1F416B5; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:21:35 +0200 (EET) Original-To: Stefan Monnier In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 07 Nov 2005 11:03:21 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) (Debian) at neti.ee X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:45592 Archived-At: > A compromise might be to return 1 for (lookup-key map [e1 e2 e3]) if > [e1 e2] is bound to a command, and to return -1 if [e1] is bound to > a prefix key and [e1 e2] is not bound to anything. > > Callers might need to be updated but a quick `abs' is all it takes > to recover the current info. Since this is an incompatible change, there is a risk of breaking code outside Emacs. My first proposal was backward incompatible too, but the risk was smaller. -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/