From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se: Keys bound to [t] does not give any help] Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:43:40 -0500 Message-ID: <871x0z1mtv.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <3685f453681496.36814963685f45@net.lu.se> <87ek506sn2.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <438BFA31.8050808@student.lu.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1133283094 32648 80.91.229.2 (29 Nov 2005 16:51:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:51:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 29 17:51:32 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eh8RB-00042e-9z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 17:34:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eh8RA-0007UV-IE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 11:34:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Eh7eF-00012L-1c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:44:03 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Eh7eD-00011z-O7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:44:02 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eh7eC-00011k-OE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:44:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [18.95.6.185] (helo=localhost.localdomain) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Eh7eD-0005eh-0D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:44:01 -0500 Original-Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 62BE61E41FE; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:43:40 -0500 (EST) Original-To: Lennart Borgman In-Reply-To: <438BFA31.8050808@student.lu.se> (Lennart Borgman's message of "Tue, 29 Nov 2005 07:50:25 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:46767 Archived-At: > Yes and no. It gives the correct answer for "C-h k" I believe, but not > for "C-h c". > > BTW I just saw that C-h c gives a bit different results when using [t]: > > C-h c a: a runs the command self-insert-command > C-h c RET: is undefined OK, I just committed a fix for both describe-key and describe-key-briefly.