From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Buffer listing in multiple frames/ttys Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 02:54:34 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <871x0k61mc.fsf@jurta.org> References: <87wtinrypp.fsf@jurta.org> <87u0dqm5ta.fsf@jurta.org> <87pso9wvjo.fsf@jurta.org> <87d5k770y4.fsf@jurta.org> <87pso5gazg.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1134266771 27218 80.91.229.2 (11 Dec 2005 02:06:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 02:06:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lorentey@elte.hu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 11 03:06:09 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ElGaQ-00084G-6a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 03:05:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ElGap-0000lk-Uh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 21:05:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ElGZD-0008Hi-EQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 21:03:59 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ElGZC-0008Gq-1j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 21:03:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ElGZB-0008Gf-Fb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 21:03:57 -0500 Original-Received: from [194.126.101.111] (helo=mail.neti.ee) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ElGaW-0002L9-C5; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 21:05:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.neti.ee (80-235-36-210-dsl.mus.estpak.ee [80.235.36.210]) by Relayhost1.neti.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5317E1628; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 04:03:39 +0200 (EET) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Richard M. Stallman's message of "Sat, 10 Dec 2005 11:18:47 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) (Debian) at neti.ee X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:47421 Archived-At: > > I'll clean up and repost my last patch that did not have such > > low-level changes. > > But please don't change next-buffer to use the global buffer list. > > > We'll have ample time to discuss a complete fix after the release. > > I guess this time is during merging the multi-tty branch into the trunk? Ok. > > I thought we were talking about the trunk. Yes, we were talking about the trunk. Any radical changes in the trunk could be postponed to the time after the next release. > If this change is only for the multi-tty branch, I don't mind > adding a new element to the frame struct in that branch. > > Is there a problem with these commands in the trunk? > That is the issue we should focus on now. There is the same problem in the trunk, but AFAIU you don't want making radical changes in low-level functions in the trunk now. -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/