From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, klaus.berndl@sdm.de
Subject: Re: ECB
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 11:04:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871wxbip52.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <umzg0shpx.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 09 Mar 2006 00:18:50 +0200")
>> > And IMVHO display-buffer should be moved from c-kernel to elisp-code
>> 100% agreement.
> Based on what, exactly? Do we know for a fact that its performance is
> so unimportant that the slower running times of Lisp will go
> unnoticed?
I must say I'd be stunned if you could show me any evidence that an elisp
implementation would incur any noticeable preformance hit: if you look at
the C code of display-buffer you'll see it has no loop, and if you look at
the calls to display-buffer you'll see it's never called inside a loop.
I.e. its performance is completely uninteresting.
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-09 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-08 9:50 ECB klaus.berndl
2006-03-08 14:54 ` ECB Stefan Monnier
2006-03-08 15:08 ` ECB Drew Adams
2006-03-09 4:44 ` ECB Miles Bader
2006-03-08 22:18 ` ECB Eli Zaretskii
2006-03-09 16:04 ` Stefan Monnier [this message]
2006-03-09 19:59 ` ECB Eli Zaretskii
2006-03-11 22:05 ` ECB Juri Linkov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-03-08 9:45 ECB klaus.berndl
2006-03-09 17:13 ` ECB Richard Stallman
2006-03-07 17:01 ECB klaus.berndl
2006-03-08 4:22 ` ECB Richard Stallman
2006-03-07 13:48 ECB klaus.berndl
2006-03-07 16:48 ` ECB Stefan Monnier
2006-03-08 4:21 ` ECB Richard Stallman
2004-07-13 12:42 ECB Berndl, Klaus
2004-07-14 18:26 ` ECB Richard Stallman
2004-07-14 18:27 ` ECB Richard Stallman
2004-07-07 16:57 ECB Berndl, Klaus
2004-07-07 20:50 ` ECB Jérôme Marant
2004-07-07 16:54 ECB Berndl, Klaus
2004-07-08 23:18 ` ECB Richard Stallman
2004-07-11 23:24 ` ECB Richard Stallman
2004-07-07 16:47 ECB Berndl, Klaus
[not found] <E1Bgmxo-0006Bh-0o@monty-python.gnu.org>
2004-07-05 12:06 ` ECB Eric M. Ludlam
2004-07-05 12:53 ` ECB Stefan
[not found] ` <E1BhoWE-0004n3-7k@fencepost.gnu.org>
[not found] ` <200407061241.i66CfX1w016798@projectile.siege-engine.com>
2004-07-12 23:58 ` ECB Richard Stallman
2004-07-02 17:51 ECB Richard Stallman
2004-07-02 18:10 ` ECB Jason Rumney
2004-07-02 20:29 ` ECB Jérôme Marant
2004-07-03 18:21 ` ECB Richard Stallman
2004-07-03 21:56 ` ECB Jason Rumney
2004-07-05 14:23 ` ECB Richard Stallman
2004-07-06 1:29 ` ECB Miles Bader
2004-07-06 7:41 ` ECB Jason Rumney
2004-07-06 21:59 ` ECB Richard Stallman
2004-07-03 15:22 ` ECB Kai Grossjohann
2004-07-03 17:05 ` ECB Stefan
2004-07-04 2:13 ` ECB Richard Stallman
2004-07-04 9:38 ` ECB Kai Grossjohann
2004-07-04 10:24 ` ECB Jason Rumney
2004-07-04 12:01 ` ECB Jens Lautenbacher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871wxbip52.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org \
--to=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=klaus.berndl@sdm.de \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).