From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Romain Francoise Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A question about read syntax and compiled backreferences Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 13:13:52 +0100 Organization: orebokech dot com Message-ID: <871wkwvqm7.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1171195999 9947 80.91.229.12 (11 Feb 2007 12:13:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 12:13:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, schwab@suse.de, handa@m17n.org, Miles Bader To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 11 13:13:14 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HGDZw-0005pC-4R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2007 13:13:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HGDZv-0005Wb-I8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2007 07:13:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HGDZY-0005K6-F1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2007 07:12:48 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HGDZW-0005JT-7B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2007 07:12:47 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HGDZV-0005JM-SJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2007 07:12:45 -0500 Original-Received: from yeast.orebokech.com ([82.67.41.165]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HGDZT-0002fq-61; Sun, 11 Feb 2007 07:12:43 -0500 Original-Received: from pacem.orebokech.com (pacem.orebokech.com [192.168.1.3]) by yeast.orebokech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F07AF12F7B; Sun, 11 Feb 2007 13:12:40 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by pacem.orebokech.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BDBEB52424; Sun, 11 Feb 2007 13:13:52 +0100 (CET) X-Face: }9mYu,e_@+e!`Z-P5kVXa3\_b:hdJ"B)ww[&=b<2=awG:GOIM, lekktu@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, schwab@suse.de, handa@m17n.org In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Mon\, 29 Jan 2007 18\:52\:59 -0500") X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4 (tstamp-) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66257 Archived-At: It seems that the print-circle change also triggers a problem in VM, which now takes an insanely long time to compile (I interrupted it after 30 minutes). Is there any hope that the speed issues introduced by this change will be fixed before the release? Otherwise I'm going to ask the VM maintainer to use `byte-compile-disable-print-circle'... (See http://bugs.debian.org/410492 for more info.) Thanks, -- Romain Francoise | The sea! the sea! the open it's a miracle -- http://orebokech.com/ | sea! The blue, the fresh, the | ever free! --Bryan W. Procter