From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Strange recenter-top-bottom behaviour in CVS Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2008 15:15:00 +0100 Message-ID: <871w7vsavv.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <8763x7mpa0.fsf@rabkins.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1201961858 21149 80.91.229.12 (2 Feb 2008 14:17:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 14:17:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Yoni Rabkin Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 02 15:17:59 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JLJBr-0001Ks-Fl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 15:17:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JLJBP-0001Je-OU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 09:17:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JLJAk-0000r0-WA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 09:16:47 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JLJAj-0000p4-4u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 09:16:46 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JLJAi-0000oz-VR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 09:16:45 -0500 Original-Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.159]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JLJAi-0006nz-9b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 09:16:44 -0500 Original-Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so1507599fga.30 for ; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 06:15:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:sender; bh=XiFduAVqxQUTqcEOR+9Hq9L7OSg890I6rU+l247dqz8=; b=ZmtveVug0REQ5z6oVlHh9q8ofIaHK4kphu9H0DjsmYWIFYsuW3uzQQjavwjWBbr2Er7sFN9ZS9eGurhZQyUes3dxpNEVljTrMr7lfGFjTZhgafr/83PvAXqor3aUcTiecstYOyJvbpHMEmOBdZNM2+9aFhzPS+6rfosMz/7+n/w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:sender; b=OAdAnb/jOCIIMktcOB7NLXhhOyX5LWg43Rnp44l0Uxjg/gN+aui6vFeZqyRHL2msmegr5AIxdbhzv/3sNrxD/HKpMs2XSOft4U8t3ASdYpv6T3NYK24pyDeYE5f/kG1PorMl1gIYbm7r3UjN8Rb54OnGow5z++SpF4WMiFXBYII= Original-Received: by 10.78.204.1 with SMTP id b1mr8361115hug.73.1201961704122; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 06:15:04 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from bzg.ath.cx ( [129.199.80.240]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t10sm1081352muh.13.2008.02.02.06.15.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 02 Feb 2008 06:15:02 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by bzg.ath.cx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 93F481575BC; Sat, 2 Feb 2008 15:15:00 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <8763x7mpa0.fsf@rabkins.net> (Yoni Rabkin's message of "Sat, 02 Feb 2008 16:00:39 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0.0 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:88010 Archived-At: Yoni Rabkin writes: > I'm seeing strange recenter-top-bottom (C-l) behaviour in CVS > Emacs. Here is how I can recreate this on my machine. As you might guess from the name of the function, the behavior you describe is intentional. See this: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/82667/focus=83206 So whole thread is worth reading it, so that you can see if your concerns with this new behavior matches some of the ones already expressed here. -- Bastien