From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Uwe Brauer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: vc-annotate and jump to a specific line Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 11:28:40 +0200 Message-ID: <871v1skj3r.fsf@mat.ucm.es> References: <87ei5wxrz1.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87zkojwhm6.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <871v1uune0.fsf@mat.ucm.es> Reply-To: Uwe Brauer NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301218144 31652 80.91.229.12 (27 Mar 2011 09:29:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 09:29:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 27 11:29:00 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q3mHL-0005jr-UZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 11:29:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53951 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q3mHK-0008Cd-KA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 05:28:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51946 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q3mHF-0008Ao-Ng for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 05:28:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q3mHD-00031K-CX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 05:28:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:45336) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q3mHD-00030w-7E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 05:28:51 -0400 Original-Received: by wwb39 with SMTP id 39so1839195wwb.30 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 02:28:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:sender:x-mailer:from:to:cc:subject:references :reply-to:x-hashcash:x-hashcash:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=VLC+yW3i23sOjq2E/isdM6p9ljcgo3rTogjK8jPKd6c=; b=wh0fTGh+AHhqF9/uyFWC7cHF8zpbhcXv3cVTIGiVxjxBH3NDV+vSnYQjwp8U0FKrpr tnasyVMbz1JK1yjEmqaeA9A6f0zEIBJp4peQydg7YgS7oC/IyrOKSp4Dl3VGdtoutbDO wbKtX1G1qBEDLLnIQPdCtaaQXZxxKBV2v6kzk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:x-mailer:from:to:cc:subject:references:reply-to:x-hashcash :date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=JyxeRYlJbLvsyg5BkX5aEGkY4RbMVl1GsPmx1Z/kw1HElHrL+utY4EyKCqmIw+hzue e/9ftaPy/hUtwtC+o7Md9X+F7lB2TJZoe4Qxd2sUN3MAUKN1OCDuzG+YGrqEeKQiboBe UmsN3FB9ui8tVI5AhY7vHHAZw4q1dt9qi0o2I= Original-Received: by 10.216.229.4 with SMTP id g4mr1788578weq.54.1301218129955; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 02:28:49 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Burrurr (11.pool85-54-11.dynamic.orange.es [85.54.11.11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u9sm1388284wbg.17.2011.03.27.02.28.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 27 Mar 2011 02:28:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: 21.4 (patch 21) "Educational Television" XEmacs Lucid (via feedmail 11-beta-1 I) X-Hashcash: 1:20:110327:emacs-devel@gnu.org::fErvD5r5G48fCU0j:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000dXZ X-Hashcash: 1:20:110327:lekktu@gmail.com::ijrMk1MmuZKJqodR:0551u In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Sun, 27 Mar 2011 00:05:16 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) XEmacs/21.4.21 (linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 74.125.82.49 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:137744 Archived-At: >> Regarding Re: vc-annotate and jump to a specific line; Juanma Barranquero adds: > On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 12:33, Uwe Brauer wrote: >> No, edebug also did not give anything useful. > Are you able to reproduce the effect with a file which > I can annotate (one on the Emacs sources, for example)? > I'm curious about the problem, because moving to the > right line is straightforward enough that there > shouldn't be any discrepancy. I did some more testing and it might be that part of the problem is hidden deep in my init file. So I have to dig this out myself. However I tried emacs -no-init and then the function worked better. By better I mean it worked fine even in files with a lot of checkins but only in the branch where the version number started with 1.X, for version whose version number started with 2. your function behaved in the way I described. I have only access to emacs 22.1 at the moment. What about taking simple.el? I think this file should the same for emacs 22 and 23? Thanks Uwe