Re: vc-print-log vs. bzr log

[Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@gmx.net>]

On Sat, 15 Sep 2012 18:45:01 +0300 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:

>> From: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@gmx.net>
>> Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 16:56:50 +0200
>> 
>> I understand that, but ±19 seconds vs <1 second?  Is that the best VC
>> can do?
>
> If you see very different times inside and outside Emacs, then indeed
> something might be wrong with VC.  But before you conclude that, I'd
> suggest to look up the commands that Emacs ran in your ~/.bzr.log, and
> then run them, verbatim, from the shell prompt.

Here's a comparison between the shell command with M-!:

Sat 2012-09-15 16:46:33 +0200
0.182  bazaar version: 2.5.1
0.182  bzr arguments: [u'log', u'-r-1', u'/data/steve/bzr/emacs/quickfixes/lisp/gnus/gnus-group.el']
0.186  looking for plugins in /home/steve/.bazaar/plugins
0.196  looking for plugins in /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/bzrlib/plugins
0.226  looking for plugins in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/bzrlib/plugins
0.240  encoding stdout as osutils.get_user_encoding() 'utf-8'
0.309  opening working tree '/data/steve/bzr/emacs/quickfixes'
0.417  encoding stdout as osutils.get_user_encoding() 'utf-8'
0.480  return code 0

and `C-u C-x v l RET RET' on the same file:

Sat 2012-09-15 17:56:19 +0200
0.167  bazaar version: 2.5.1
0.167  bzr arguments: [u'log', u'-l', u'1', u'gnus-group.el']
0.171  looking for plugins in /home/steve/.bazaar/plugins
0.179  looking for plugins in /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/bzrlib/plugins
0.203  looking for plugins in /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/bzrlib/plugins
0.211  encoding stdout as osutils.get_user_encoding() 'utf-8'
0.277  opening working tree '/data/steve/bzr/emacs/quickfixes'
0.359  encoding stdout as osutils.get_user_encoding() 'utf-8'
18.561  return code 0

What is happening between the last two entries that takes 18 seconds?

Steve Berman