Re: [Emacs-diffs] trunk r115470: eww: exit and close actions

[Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>]

On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 21:07:00 -0500 Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA> wrote: 

>> I agree the current implementation is suboptimal but your problem is
>> with the fundamental idea of separating "close" from "exit."

SM> No, the problem is with calling eww-close instead of quit-window, and
SM> with calling eww-exit instead of kill-this-buffer.  To me, this is
SM> just obfuscation.

I understand we disagree on this.

>> - revert back to `q' being `quit-window',

SM> Yes.  As I said elsewhere, I think this binding should basically be
SM> inherited from special-mode-map.

>> - implement some way to quit all eww windows for privacy and security

SM> If someone wants that, I'm not opposed to it (tho "quitting all windows"
SM> won't give you any privacy or security benefits, so it will presumably
SM> do something else).  But I wouldn't call it "exit".  The name should
SM> instead include something like clear/wipe/flush/...

I will wait for Lars to make the final decision.  If he agrees with you,
going to just `special-mode-map' is probably the best way, and we can
forget about special "quit all" functionality.

Ted