From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Dynamic loading progress Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 10:52:04 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <871tc315y3.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <56259FDD.8040401@dancol.org> <87zizeme8k.fsf@tromey.com> <5625B166.3080104@dancol.org> <86zizdczhp.fsf@stephe-leake.org> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1446825157 29345 80.91.229.3 (6 Nov 2015 15:52:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 15:52:37 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 06 16:52:26 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZujJS-0008Sq-Df for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 16:52:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39599 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZujJR-0007QL-TG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 10:52:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35380) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZujJN-0007QC-UU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 10:52:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZujJI-0007Uy-Oe for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 10:52:21 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:55361) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZujJI-0007UO-Hx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 10:52:16 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZujJG-0008J0-NT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 16:52:15 +0100 Original-Received: from 98.229.60.157 ([98.229.60.157]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 16:52:14 +0100 Original-Received: from tzz by 98.229.60.157 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 16:52:14 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 24 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 98.229.60.157 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:8Cy0Ey2R6IxWAeB09gBpNiFlqJo= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:193435 Archived-At: On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 14:47:42 +0100 Aurélien Aptel wrote: AA> I was thinking of doing a small talk on Emacs module support at FOSDEM AA> in january. I hope by then we'll be close to done... *cross body AA> appendices* I've tried to review the discussion so far and believe the code is "functional enough." I think we got agreement from Stefan (probably John too) to exempt dynamic modules from the feature freeze. If you agree, can you please push your branch into Emacs but turn tests off, so failures don't break the build? Or maybe mark them as soft failures, if that's possible. I am concerned that otherwise we'll make it harder and harder to accept the work for the upcoming release, and that would delay dynamic modules further. Developing in a feature branch is good up to a point, but now it's become an impediment because your work is not visible to a wider audience. I hope we all agree on this. I can push it if you don't have commit access; just let me know here or off-list when it's ready. The commit message formatting may need adjusting and we may want to squash into just a few commits, but these are minor details. Ted