From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 4K Bugs Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2015 07:07:10 +0100 Message-ID: <871ta8l90x.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87mvszdp6b.fsf@gnus.org> <567E4ABA.3080803@online.de> <87d1ttxnrr.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1451196468 30176 80.91.229.3 (27 Dec 2015 06:07:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2015 06:07:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jwiegley@gmail.com, andreas.roehler@online.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Richard Stallman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 27 07:07:41 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aD4UX-0000mb-Eq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Dec 2015 07:07:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40800 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aD4UW-0007PF-J2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Dec 2015 01:07:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55681) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aD4UU-0007P9-5u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Dec 2015 01:07:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aD4UP-0005Hb-5m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Dec 2015 01:07:38 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:58212) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aD4UO-0005HV-VI; Sun, 27 Dec 2015 01:07:33 -0500 Original-Received: from 2.150.58.24.tmi.telenormobil.no ([2.150.58.24] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aD4U3-0002OZ-TK; Sun, 27 Dec 2015 07:07:12 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Sat, 26 Dec 2015 21:52:57 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1aD4U3-0002OZ-TK MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1451801232.36018@jiRfqBS1BZvs6hZhmE8vsg X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:196965 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > I agree -- but is there a way to distinguish the bug reports we close > for lack of information, from those that are closed for other reasons? > > When we close bug reports because we did not get the further > information necessary to fix them, I'd say those bug reports have been > "abandoned". Yes, we mark those with "moreinfo" (usually), and say in the text of the bug report that that's why they're closed (if we don't forget). -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no