From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Colin Baxter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Failure building Emacs master Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 19:57:54 +0000 Message-ID: <871stpnkxp.fsf@yandex.com> References: <8b2b0f82-85bd-a67f-d4e9-a6f5bf531d60@alice.it> <32e9f1c2-f41d-74c8-16b5-e169c085abb3@cs.ucla.edu> <831stqwiu6.fsf@gnu.org> <83zigd5m5o.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1490212735 20480 195.159.176.226 (22 Mar 2017 19:58:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 19:58:55 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: , eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org, Angelo Graziosi To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 22 20:58:48 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cqmP3-0004Ju-Hc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:58:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53091 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqmP9-000101-7b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:58:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36681) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqmOW-0000yL-Ao for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:58:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqmOV-0001z3-L4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:58:08 -0400 Original-Received: from forward1o.cmail.yandex.net ([37.9.109.84]:36168) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqmOR-0001we-Hx; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:58:03 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp1m.mail.yandex.net (smtp1m.mail.yandex.net [77.88.61.132]) by forward1o.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 75F9121CD3; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 22:58:00 +0300 (MSK) Original-Received: from smtp1m.mail.yandex.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1m.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id E9AE263C0419; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 22:57:58 +0300 (MSK) Original-Received: by smtp1m.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id Un1ruydIL6-vvB0Rjww; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 22:57:57 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1490212678; bh=OXV+g7IAfUeUY5xvz4w3DiUrG4Ex6sYX9WsjnChC3bE=; h=From:To:Cc:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:Message-ID; b=bHMAD/G3snhxma7+8GIHGSrivQbCY4RgGoLWWznToy6N3ymoLDkHR0Ngq0atRoZaK yNUdHoPp+ceNJ/gficMDG89/4NDe1U0TshvswgW/lkVMbZt6T9UTfGyEnJlgpCG91k E/34/NSXwwALKA8/6BynIV/Eb+XnuQwwhyHSG9CI= Authentication-Results: smtp1m.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.com X-Yandex-Suid-Status: 1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0 In-Reply-To: <83zigd5m5o.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 22 Mar 2017 18:08:51 +0200") Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwAgMAAAAqbBEUAAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAAAFz UkdCAK7OHOkAAAAgY0hSTQAAeiYAAICEAAD6AAAAgOgAAHUwAADqYAAAOpgAABdwnLpRPAAAAAxQ TFRF8d8Gwx4p07Wi////YneHdQAAAAFiS0dEAxEMTPIAAAAJcEhZcwAACxIAAAsSAdLdfvwAAAFZ SURBVCjPZZLBasJAEIYnEgveVoiheuyhoE+RQh/AihPMnnrohsan8NAHsOAG9CRiSrNP2X8mpj10 TvPxz+7M/rNEiOFmcqU+tnV56POo+gpVdoM7b729wThlxOFZIS4UTKdIzm+Jgpkr3Es+Yi1j9wpI g+Z1vQdU7KzPG0jo6Ji3YQuwRAPPHBDMRUZDz1ag4TzDLKhSsDsauA5aUR4bPQIo9jTlTgls9zTz UC5a9k5zXtvw+QDgKxXSJhlLI4dp8hAoFtiQA3xnsTQqUIYBnswCUOICgCFRDpTKmTgROFPkpWwV gs+XFBVQLiPAEU/onoOrV4ZM3cOLoWTaTy2eFv17HDyFIVZyXpPCLIQrDFHfRPEypyq5QgWYiM+t WA9YcBf5WZbYGZ+XYnxUeoVWt1p52ZDtlj9ueO24Xzc6Hbm9/YNTqNNT/0VSl3y45e/niQzt/iCj f/EDBae52Zd5lNIAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6Y3JlYXRlADIwMTctMDItMjFUMTU6MjI6MTgrMDA6MDAy vBNIAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOm1vZGlmeQAyMDE3LTAyLTIxVDE1OjIyOjE4KzAwOjAwQ+Gr9AAAABF0 RVh0anBlZzpjb2xvcnNwYWNlADIsdVWfAAAAIHRFWHRqcGVnOnNhbXBsaW5nLWZhY3RvcgAxeDEs MXgxLDF4MemV/HAAAAAASUVORK5CYII= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 37.9.109.84 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:213251 Archived-At: Hello, On Wed, Mar 22 2017, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org >> From: Angelo Graziosi >> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 21:13:37 +0100 >> >> Il 21/03/2017 20:06, Eli Zaretskii ha scritto: >> >> From: Paul Eggert >> >> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 11:24:23 -0700 >> >> Cc: Emacs developers >> >> >> >> On 03/21/2017 09:45 AM, Angelo Graziosi wrote: >> >>> It seems the patch is not yet applied on master.. >> >> >> >> I applied it just now (with streamlined diagnostics), since you and I >> >> liked the idea and there wasn't any opposing opinion. >> > >> > I reverted it, since I specifically asked not to make this the >> > default. >> > >> >> ..then you should fix also the configure warning... [*] > > I'm not against clarifying messages, I just think that removing a > feature which needs the message instead of improving the message is > too drastic a measure. > > Paul clarified the message, so if the new wording is clear enough in > your opinion, we can close the issue. > > Thanks. I'm sorry to appear extremely stupid but I remain confused, even after reading this thread again. If I use ./configure --with-mailutils then I will (potentially) build emacs-26 with encrypted POP3 - correct? Colin.