From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2018 10:07:01 +0200 Message-ID: <871sbbrk9m.fsf@gmx.de> References: <8736wa9c5s.fsf@gmx.de> <87wotkn6do.fsf@gmx.de> > <874lgn8x6l.fsf@gmx.de> > <87sh44pisz.fsf@gmx.de> <87a7qbitc7.fsf@gmx.de>> <878t5tdsfc.fsf@gmx.de>> <83wotcpzub.fsf@gnu.org> <87bmaiuwml.fsf@gmx.de> <877el6uwio.fsf@gmx.de>> <7c28f9d8-e2bb-4778-ab92-92707f12718f@default>> <837el6t8r3.fsf@gnu.org>> <39939ea5-a7c2-400a-9ac1-4df7cf4fcb42@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1533542746 16851 195.159.176.226 (6 Aug 2018 08:05:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 08:05:46 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Howard Melman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 06 10:05:42 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fmaWL-0004GD-Nw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2018 10:05:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32971 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fmaYS-0006BB-AA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2018 04:07:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47601) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fmaXn-0006B4-4A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2018 04:07:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fmaXi-0001aO-2D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2018 04:07:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:52979) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fmaXh-0001Ze-Nq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2018 04:07:05 -0400 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([212.86.52.225]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MPHrQ-1fr0OU304m-004Tdm; Mon, 06 Aug 2018 10:07:02 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Howard Melman's message of "Mon, 06 Aug 2018 00:21:19 -0400") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:DkQh4U6kYNdJ+XdvgAhkNcbZwiJoAYjmqXydes++0R+2Op2oiAA BNSyPzcaJd/hPUaqYOEK0B3fLUBllwtYAILsty7F/o7HT1ednnWyN4SCjsAmCLqhYuQgriq inXdouFfPewTVtkyOGn91NDpGlEpHgaNBbUoyp2U+c0mCz1VQrIul87KEvtoQCZE0hlmETX tWDYk/Zxd25OE/jvMvmOQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:Zq1v7tjw2AU=:5tR9jEEg2Yp9kukXiowYHC BGsPGw7oXoMMu1Rv/FVHrMljVNvScYC/J3qacAfQF3ECCwFWnc/NfvadcPcwnVR+3qU19Bh2F coJ2AF0CTw3jIi9hJA7ic2KlE7IPXOp81mtt/OCvlIrTMvdn3XzxFi88bLuHC4n1ufbpuF2sV rFmxL7fA09+hbO3B9yGvy1JHvxHRbzZ59L8tIoSXD9MLm3zBw3CoaFwUnvHpGmDZdflpf6mHA ZqeljErHVe6phamcsR64aOVEMA7TbUaqOf2XypFkkpgDINHkgySoo2CycYEjR1bItHQ+cNiWY Hz5U8ek4yT3yCmGtHzh1AWVpf45y1GfAxSrx5nlI0ozDPVBeyWzOfvIfF0YG6CBz/abwXBl2Q u6iMTqclkN/r7jcJ4/oKW9zGupUZMHz3WkwNLQZtAlIlsOeGrbXCYLVQM5+4c6nMBG9l4n0gJ kiryAepyQLE06pyRGpaAq70wxOFNJxu9ArWrRseiIAsOeY5e/oEXQrRi1wbhz+gJvU+y5C7t0 GTa79kOcWlYsln1bddBbqgg7pDNnB0kNESpNJmlrzzjDKjn6Y7fgNttUyIUoiES1MWsoBEoPs vM3S8WtBSPh3D0ws8hRsKF9eepvIicJQxQIKoaGtIZEGFMx6VxMshenXgy5UkZc0xnqPLhB4p +kjJ/lbSy4CL+sfD3aeRrnio0mIse/7Wwkon4l63sJGN1GhR+kTLOyk5vEY9ittzinBJxQXfD QLOAGjD6obIPi+O7w/QaktCBnKueky0x45mjGqYjsR4mOw0QnNWii0geguAFie8JlwFeIGrI X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:228207 Archived-At: Howard Melman writes: Hi Howard, > My sense is that the proposed C-x & is a prefix, because it > is used before another key sequence. It is not an argument > because it doesn't affect the functions' argument list the > way C-u does. I'd agree with this. > Maybe the term should be "prefix sequence"? I like this proposal. "Prefix key sequence" would be more precise, but it doesn't read fluid. If there isn't any objection over the next week, I'll apply your wording. > Wasn't there are a proposal at one point to do something > similar for C-x 4 and C-x 5 so that there didn't have to be > -other-window and -other-frame variants of so many > commands? I'm not aware of such a proposal (which only means that my memory is bad), but it makes sense. Best regards, Michael.