From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CEDET Automated tests Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:01:05 +0200 Message-ID: <871rveqvy6.fsf@gnus.org> References: <0729985d-0c4c-646b-3668-baf55130f093@siege-engine.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="181073"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Emacs Development To: Eric Ludlam Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 15 10:01:20 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iKHlg-000kzn-BO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:01:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36638 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iKHle-0006Vk-Sy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 04:01:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53076) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iKHlY-0006VC-HD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 04:01:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iKHlX-00088C-Cz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 04:01:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.91.231.51] (port=46508 helo=quimby.gnus.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iKHlX-00086l-3x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 04:01:11 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iKHlR-0001qA-Ka; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:01:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: <0729985d-0c4c-646b-3668-baf55130f093@siege-engine.com> (Eric Ludlam's message of "Sun, 13 Oct 2019 17:53:11 -0400") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 80.91.231.51 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:241036 Archived-At: Eric Ludlam writes: > I have a patch that converts a bunch of the tests in test/manual/cedet > to be automated tests in test/lisp/cedet. Of the tests left in > manual, I also fixed them so they run. Great! > While I was there, I brought over some tests from CEDET on > sourceforge, or updated the tests from manual to the newer version. > Those tests are all covered by old assignments. > > The patch is pretty big due to moving files around. What's the best > way to provide the patch? Perhaps just opening a bug report and posting it there? I don't think there's any size restrictions in the bug tracker. But it the size mostly due to moving files around, does "git format-patch" help? It's supposed to have file moves as just a single line, if I remember correctly. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no