From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Jonas Bernoulli Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Slot accessing issues in EIEIO Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 17:44:10 +0200 Message-ID: <871rnx131x.fsf@bernoul.li> References: <87a72lhf3b.wl-all_but_last@163.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="20390"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier , Zhu Zihao Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 06 17:46:55 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jWMG7-0005F2-0Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 06 May 2020 17:46:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58712 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jWMG5-0001ta-Ub for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 06 May 2020 11:46:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46698) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jWMDV-0000Xx-6b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2020 11:44:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([212.243.197.30]:46636) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jWMDU-0001Qd-DM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2020 11:44:12 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28E7016693; Wed, 6 May 2020 17:44:11 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by Hostpark/NetZone Mailprotection at hostpark.net Original-Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail0.hostpark.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10124) with ESMTP id u65lWmrjQHyY; Wed, 6 May 2020 17:44:10 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B1EC016634; Wed, 6 May 2020 17:44:10 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: none client-ip=212.243.197.30; envelope-from=jonas@bernoul.li; helo=mail.hostpark.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/06 11:40:56 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = ??? X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:249095 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> Recently, I'm reading the source of >> closql(https://github.com/emacscollective/closql), A Emacs sqlite database ORM >> package. It use eieio object, and put a piece of advice on eieio-oref to >> intercept the reading slot action. > > Yuck! Can you explain why they need an advice on `eieio-oref`? > > > Stefan A right. That's one of the reasons I never bothered to get eieio changed to better accommodate my extension; I expected a negative reaction like this.