From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Concern about new binding. Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 12:52:07 -0600 Message-ID: <871rdymhew.fsf@red-bean.com> References: <20210202134950.vybbpf3iewbymfjo.ref@Ergus> <20210202134950.vybbpf3iewbymfjo@Ergus> <878s86tnv6.fsf@red-bean.com> <8735ye5otc.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> Reply-To: Karl Fogel Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38973"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Ergus , thibaut.verron@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Sean Whitton Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 02 19:53:32 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l70ns-000A0E-SG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 19:53:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38324 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l70nr-0007X7-Su for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 13:53:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57012) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l70mZ-0006Fp-1A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 13:52:11 -0500 Original-Received: from sanpietro.red-bean.com ([45.79.25.59]:33586) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l70mX-0004uG-EL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 13:52:10 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=red-bean.com; s=202005newsp; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:Date:Reply-To:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=iBnrVvZUSbNGeFubodEWU3Y0YPz0OxJneiChmDTHeTA=; t=1612291929; x=1613501529; b=j3t6EcSIBWQs5nYWk8Gotk+SxodM1c2oYTaJ2XZg10MJM3gULzTwGj99eznbrzpsxp1llpMAHM xR2sEbWaqonp2zIl8Gwzh61ytOeTwb5wriHIukqGWpvKBIOJxiNVKw4Gqi2n+oVP9WCj+AMcp7kR9 38o+JbUomfTlu1HlUtSjQNUF2GWpUnbEiReFS5CKkExYEDdfY3onnU9QzmVMZltsWVBU2zXFCaLRO KSGZkRShsXB+fAvwZae/sAft3O98Ql+5Od9VUOUM6dCDbe+61eCNWaunzf72nfsc4F77xYwqLhZF1 vmtAb+s0497nOaB4cHt/vkOqZCp5Kdx2F0Qkg==; Original-Received: from 99-112-125-163.lightspeed.cicril.sbcglobal.net ([99.112.125.163]:37592 helo=floss) by sanpietro.red-bean.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l70mW-0000WK-KB; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 18:52:08 +0000 In-Reply-To: <8735ye5otc.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> (Sean Whitton's message of "Tue, 02 Feb 2021 11:04:15 -0700") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.79.25.59; envelope-from=kfogel@red-bean.com; helo=sanpietro.red-bean.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:263737 Archived-At: On 02 Feb 2021, Sean Whitton wrote: >No, projectile was C-c p, but it eventually removed it and just >suggested in its docs that users bind it themselves. I think >that approach would be sensible for magit too. +1, but apparently the Magit devs considered that possibility and rejected it :-/. >AFAICT, there's an implicit additional convention that major and >minor modes stick to the sequences that are reserved for them. >Given this, ISTM that as magit chose to bind C-x g, there was >inevitably going to be a clash like this sooner or later. Agreed.