From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Enabling native compilation by default when libgccjit is present Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2021 10:55:28 +0100 Message-ID: <871r2nqv3j.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87czmdqpv9.fsf@web.de> <83h7bo7rvz.fsf@gnu.org> <87bl1tjage.fsf@web.de> <877dchj9cu.fsf@web.de> <83ee6ozfb0.fsf@gnu.org> <87tufjvnc2.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12729"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 08 10:57:23 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1muthT-0003Cu-Ab for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2021 10:57:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34728 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1muthQ-0002Yo-Vr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2021 04:57:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52720) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mutfh-0001kM-MW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2021 04:55:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [2a00:1450:4864:20::331] (port=41682 helo=mail-wm1-x331.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mutff-0004ED-MZ; Wed, 08 Dec 2021 04:55:33 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-x331.google.com with SMTP id az34-20020a05600c602200b0033bf8662572so1416711wmb.0; Wed, 08 Dec 2021 01:55:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version; bh=mngPMX1MJRiyYaxSmcR0MJ/mT5vEZZx0oud5TOtFMJg=; b=AXaBdrkPzqhm6Njy52lfnMlBWErLfviGxKt15ltzWJBdCJo4yyII57DeOzX5cXc7Dh hv7s46E7VjpeUKO3GFxj9Qgb59cUwuSLjfWipeZc+nDF3daMlSnlOf+DX7s3uP4Ax0XS 61wGIX0YQ7x+d/YeCEESP8rUlaV8elr6H1FEcLN6I23ybGAzkHC0sSMP4NswML+xiB5V k/lSVd8kWIzi/yjWa5X3Htc3+Wg7P7UK2SPQW6ddwW2GDI6/WXfeH2Jkq+ZmdQeRTosd 7YWadMCr4zM8iVGpkFP8pdd1mLOvB9wM035Tqr31As5ErChDmM7h8Xqpu4woA+qBACDE KjWQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version; bh=mngPMX1MJRiyYaxSmcR0MJ/mT5vEZZx0oud5TOtFMJg=; b=JgF1WuleNxMDb7Qekdvod78aemWTeuHfXtV8Y7VPMzI4syGvpjnFgA9kFYVrB9wu9C 6frXGlzb90T490CMq68S9qFZBRP4OFNmmbrVwp9tLOzgnV22yCDJvtQ0YpQWPv4i7TQ+ Yd4a0UY73vnTRKBaO3wVLg6pJ8CPSnBSak2lY8CKDBrfbslKRon+wjK6Df9ClqWtwP/a dmw+2fZYAKiZzyQrq216rHNJKZ/BVRK6YBniheRLDquduugK5eo9ptoZpJMsAyRpfLOs ihLPygo3eHX+R2tm59p9C8tx3AvvQdsbPliU3UhcDcd+CFU/Ra2JL71Yq5shmVRUEVpD mvnA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533oDgyIvzu7dcVifxkhARjSsS2bF8Qkk017HtbjM1AAcV+d3KJA YKw7PFR4cINcepl7+Gt2Z0SxnH9YMwM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw9kJ+HkuL8IOti5Mfcz0QddlTI4OsblfwDiRwqcFrELSMEHKoEBGMxJroRj4ze88gFxiOuDQ== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:ce83:: with SMTP id q3mr14727240wmj.37.1638957329733; Wed, 08 Dec 2021 01:55:29 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from rltb ([2a01:e0a:3f3:fb50:e06b:fb08:141a:5ed3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 21sm2100722wmj.18.2021.12.08.01.55.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 08 Dec 2021 01:55:29 -0800 (PST) Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: <87tufjvnc2.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Wed, 08 Dec 2021 03:31:57 +0100") X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a00:1450:4864:20::331 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::331; envelope-from=rpluim@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x331.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -12 X-Spam_score: -1.3 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, PDS_HP_HELO_NORDNS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:281332 Archived-At: >>>>> On Wed, 08 Dec 2021 03:31:57 +0100, Michael Heerdegen said: Michael> So `foo' requiring `bar' is enough? Ok, that would be natural and Michael> normal, I expected something worse. Thanks for the explanation. Michael> Is this information unobvious enough to be added as a note to the Michael> manual text describing native compilation? Now is seems obvious to me Michael> but yesterday it wasn't. Please check the latest version of the emacs lisp manual in emacs-28. Robert --