From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jai Flack Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: lazy-count-update-hook run with inconsistent point Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2022 15:24:17 +1000 Message-ID: <871qyoynlq.fsf@disroot.org> References: <9631587bddf2ab3b07b60bd4195cc3e1@disroot.org> <87r17tmnzc.fsf@gmail.com> <8735k9jrr2.fsf@posteo.net> <87mtihmh8t.fsf@gmail.com> <87tucoblfh.fsf@disroot.org> <878rtxdh6a.fsf@gmail.com> <87czim3z8g.fsf_-_@disroot.org> <87zglqf6pp.fsf@gmail.com> <87r170t1vm.fsf@disroot.org> <871qyzpt6u.fsf@posteo.net> <87ee2s87qp.fsf@disroot.org> <86ee2reopn.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87k0cietbh.fsf_-_@disroot.org> <87bkxuqxgk.fsf@gmail.com> <86wngimnbm.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87r16qqs6f.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7282"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Juri Linkov , Philip Kaludercic , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Augusto Stoffel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 27 08:34:54 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nYMUI-0001eV-9Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2022 08:34:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60196 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nYMUG-0006O8-Jh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2022 02:34:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47486) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nYLOA-0001pH-On for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2022 01:24:30 -0400 Original-Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:59642) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nYLO9-0002Ol-3C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2022 01:24:30 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55F99401D1; Sun, 27 Mar 2022 07:24:27 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org Original-Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aXdT0rxmoVT6; Sun, 27 Mar 2022 07:24:23 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1648358663; bh=bhjZk9ntMBwCHXZrNjDJ8FwbJAy6OPJm3mg0ivcDfzk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=F+8zSKgR5sb4zFUEciLm2eZR6AIHrsxHuvRiwPf1XpwMBALA3eKHhIt9Hfsy45J+E /4ynCNv+Y+pIh1/rXSnI9NjjTcZezmsKkzBHkMyIlvVGaTt6o9kJraSBb6BHjE38ov 9HDB4JTsmDAfDD1ACn+J0WbQdyP1LMOcOyM9G+8EliRC/6hM5CFPBk0YzGIWUNrw88 0Ym7V4Y2v0rqNbKsh/iWZywjoC9de7Ykr7a+aVgw3P04CANpiYpHgpprcNk6qQ02NR plFUNy5o+G7FpkkGld0PCa9tf41xnh6wF7kXjCWL/4049JnO5fJD7/G2ROazy2pe4P JNaZE7se1XeRA== In-Reply-To: <87r16qqs6f.fsf@gmail.com> (Augusto Stoffel's message of "Fri, 25 Mar 2022 10:48:08 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=178.21.23.139; envelope-from=jflack@disroot.org; helo=knopi.disroot.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 27 Mar 2022 02:33:21 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:287501 Archived-At: Augusto Stoffel writes: > On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 at 10:36, Juri Linkov wrote: > >> Running the hook was also under another condition: >> `(when isearch-lazy-count ...)'. Shouldn't it be added >> to `(when nomore ...)' too? > > Ah, of course. That looks good. -- Thanks, Jai