From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Other details about completion. Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2022 11:07:55 +0200 Message-ID: <871qyaful0.fsf@gnus.org> References: <20220401153839.idrzrbfl2yfzga3y.ref@Ergus> <20220401153839.idrzrbfl2yfzga3y@Ergus> <86r16g92v5.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <20220401202425.jfrwqmkm3ffmcm5h@Ergus> <20220404193501.adojhz7uvvaoq4sj@Ergus> <86czhw4oqr.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <4E8D9AEF-4D7A-4B11-822F-8D0911964A05@aol.com> <86bkxfibdo.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <20220405232013.5y5jnr4ykzqgxqla@Ergus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38119"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Philip Kaludercic , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Juri Linkov To: Ergus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 06 11:10:06 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nc1fx-0009kC-JS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2022 11:10:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54462 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nc1fw-0005hk-Hd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2022 05:10:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34806) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nc1e3-0003wY-Tc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2022 05:08:08 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2]:52860) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nc1e2-0005xG-E6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2022 05:08:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=I5O4XqfYH46Ep31LgwVee97jALlXsRgAfpC3xH7gBq8=; b=hauVtmyixjiFvxr7qcroF+tZDt P/6Q2HvOMZek3SB3tRPCm9vCPhxMD9hSIDvEiiqP7U8m99gbTPAJ+HQb9qM/99ngzq3k6b80JSTVd v7v/qDvqethFMDwiGoz0dn/t/IPIQ0HgaKgraSK4r5pfXZqY3+pnJ1AtbJ333nDoPV7w=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nc1du-0000ul-0u; Wed, 06 Apr 2022 11:08:00 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20220405232013.5y5jnr4ykzqgxqla@Ergus> (Ergus's message of "Wed, 6 Apr 2022 01:20:13 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2; envelope-from=larsi@gnus.org; helo=quimby.gnus.org X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:287832 Archived-At: Ergus writes: > 1) I think it is more intuitive to invert and use the M-S- > minibuffer-choose-** and M- for > minibuffer-{previous|next}-completion for not insert commands... I was a bit surprised at how M- worked -- I had expected it to work like M-S- works, really. But after using it a few times, I think it the M- action makes more ergonomic sense, so I'd rather keep it the way Juri has it now. > 2) The M-/M- is not intuitive when completions are not in > one-column format, and the M-/M- cannot be used because > they are already taken.. I agree with that -- I expected M- to work on the visually displayed completions, not the logical order. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no