From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Instead of pcase Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 09:09:46 +0100 Message-ID: <871qcodcmt.fsf@dataswamp.org> References: <87fs15d0uv.fsf@dataswamp.org> <83edgppki9.fsf@gnu.org> <87cyw9cpj9.fsf@dataswamp.org> <834jhkq1jp.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5038"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:YnTGho7XP0b/z0NK/LqeIMj2DOM= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 17 12:49:17 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1r3xLZ-00015O-Gg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 12:49:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r3xKv-00026a-EB; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 06:48:37 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r3tvL-0004Y3-5V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 03:10:01 -0500 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r3tvJ-0005Z4-9q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 03:09:58 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1r3tvG-0004SI-2z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 09:09:54 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 06:48:35 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:312864 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> But if that is what you are hoping for, why don't we >> revisit this discussion if and when that happens? > > The only thing I'm hoping for is for Emacs to get better and > continue its development. If that is wrong, maybe you want > to step up and replace me as Emacs maintainer? Pro hint: Don't start this kind of campaigns against libraries your own software is relying on, only for vague reasons of style and complexity, and with no alternative in sight. No one is going to react positively to that and it won't help Emacs development, as it only creates bad blood in the community for no reason. -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal