From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: cond* Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2024 13:09:47 +0000 Message-ID: <871qauwquc.fsf@localhost> References: <87frzuae9n.fsf@posteo.net> <871qbatqc8.fsf@posteo.net> <87wmsz7lzn.fsf@posteo.net> <87edf1m7lq.fsf@localhost> <87il4a76zw.fsf@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18810"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 06 14:07:27 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rM6Ob-0004cf-BE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2024 14:07:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rM6OC-0002AD-0e; Sat, 06 Jan 2024 08:07:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rM6O4-00023L-Ka for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2024 08:06:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rM6Np-0002wP-Mn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2024 08:06:50 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15847240101 for ; Sat, 6 Jan 2024 14:06:33 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1704546394; bh=oSpI+dlHGmtj71AcKxhwRxcR+P0z8fhF7qQlpHDaz1w=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=cbVslD9tO5XWCUWxIE2wxRh06vk0JVs1323XTT1Qtp2p1cDfJEL2yEdRbyUJPlAiv btarPv8+6qWDaAQAk3AKpjRwrzsjJR/CUXli2JErRfEQ1fbIOOaGTAddvAgIbknkKm O3GGl5qqD5g1AyOjUlZLf4e4aIMPNYWPCR8WXQCCGi2H1S6FOjUFkzBr6FjS/8hR2S 7OPaVI3fv+o7grZZ1YjJvvWl+jNgA7cZO3u1m3M+79iNGtCoyLrEUlkpXwrlXJLSFT gk+8rf0wF8bMUxDlma2YRzfh6mFZFA2BlgC+4X12a27Bc/m9ObRE40laIx2SKiaAxV 1z5XI6BrOr0ag== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4T6gZK1hdSz9rxF; Sat, 6 Jan 2024 14:06:33 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:314619 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > ... > What Emacs really implements in search is numbered groups. > So that was the easiest thing to implement in `rx'. > > But if it is possible to implement the named variables for thisin > pcase, surely they can be implemented in `rx' too. > > How about if we add them to `rx'? WDYT? May you please elaborate how you see named variables in `rx'? `rx' is a macro that transforms a sexp into string regexp. It does not introduce let-bindings. So, I do not see any context to put named variables within `rx' itself. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at