From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why not include all ELPA packages in an Emacs release? Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 16:06:26 +0000 Message-ID: <871q5ktxfh.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87bk4ql3u5.fsf@jeremybryant.net> <864jagu9ji.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27278"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Kangas , jb@jeremybryant.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Arash Esbati Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 29 18:07:28 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sCLpo-0006qL-2K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 29 May 2024 18:07:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sCLp0-0007FQ-QO; Wed, 29 May 2024 12:06:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sCLox-0007EY-FI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2024 12:06:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sCLot-0002rd-6J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2024 12:06:35 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEC47240027 for ; Wed, 29 May 2024 18:06:28 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1716998788; bh=dkSTtKhUWp6lXqijCuNWdwMMK9G+nh6qF2nbH/zHHIA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:OpenPGP:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type:From; b=b3KWd+sIzx2kjl2Unip2LxCPxP0ljg0qzhxmjBm//6QjiXr1lhZK+4G8AomJAiBqI HkRnsqSeEiARzNxPjSld3WibTK2153oBQi2qkHmSvz9wy9J3vq2OTlU0IZCpY9JZN2 lZwlZwEQXgLN9eCydMWdAv2n14Tqyc0Cfhx8bwmckc8ccS0zpfB90l4iAclvnS/Gzh DEVOGdPM4hxkXgMybmHtuiqAhKNwF4XvBXUYllGFuJ9fsMo30V8aA+nkw1ivKJ2Cfo KziTGuvVJyvlH3AXyM7PAS+omR9wD5IdVNwZGgRjlry2rwcMeeo+cawpqBk9LrwYac 2PLliDlKoHMPA== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4VqDlR5Qppz6tlh; Wed, 29 May 2024 18:06:27 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Arash Esbati's message of "Wed, 29 May 2024 17:27:31 +0200") OpenPGP: id=7126E1DE2F0CE35C770BED01F2C3CC513DB89F66; url="https://keys.openpgp.org/vks/v1/by-fingerprint/7126E1DE2F0CE35C770BED01F2C3CC513DB89F66"; preference=signencrypt Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:319696 Archived-At: Arash Esbati writes: > Eli Zaretskii writes: > >> If there are packages on ELPA which we consider to be a must for users >> (I don't think there are, but maybe I'm forgetting something), lets >> add them to core instead. > > If Emacs considers in-buffer completion an important feature, then I'd > say corfu and cape are must. I am not familiar with cape, but IIRC the issue with corfu is that without any further changes, it doesn't support non-graphical Emacs, right? > vertico and marginalia are also must in my > book since they offer a better experience with vertical minibuffer > completion. "Better", in this case, than `fido-vertical-mode'? > And while we're at it: There are sometimes requests for adding AUCTeX to > core. Do you have an opinion about that? I would certainly be a fan of that move. > Best, Arash -- Philip Kaludercic on peregrine