Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> After all, how frequently do you need to edit files with lines in
> excess of 11K characters?

The lines in the file are 1454 characters long and there are 3870 of
them.

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> That's not what the text there says.  It says that mg is simpler, but
> faster, and gives this particular example of how it is faster.  The
> impression that a naïve observer will end up after that is that Emacs
> is simply unworkable, since it cannot even scroll through a file in
> some reasonably short time.

I neither wrote nor said that mg was faster.