From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karthik Chikmagalur Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Concern about new binding. Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 18:13:38 -0800 Message-ID: <86zh04iwtp.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87zh0mmr54.fsf@gmail.com> <20210203180142.seu6o3i6u7jhkyrh@Ergus> <83eehx3to5.fsf@gnu.org> <20210203221628.xgvvxjvh56gyswba@Ergus> <20210204070033.pm4ido4hq7a6twif@Ergus> <83sg6brhyg.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6sjpyqs.fsf@gnus.org> <838s83ra3q.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtwjocn7.fsf@gnus.org> <87o8gzpj31.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87wnvmlwjq.fsf@gnus.org> <87k0rmkh68.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <875z35frk0.fsf@gnus.org> <87o8gxf1fg.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <874kio84ht.fsf@gnus.org> <87mtwg6oi6.fsf@gnus.org> <86czx8bzcz.fsf@gmail.com> <87o8gl8afq.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18337"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: Sean Whitton , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 16 03:14:18 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lBpsX-0004fk-EQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 03:14:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55812 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lBpsW-0005U3-EZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 21:14:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45456) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lBps0-000533-EA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 21:13:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pg1-x534.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::534]:35262) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lBpry-00011T-Vq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 21:13:44 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pg1-x534.google.com with SMTP id t25so5317436pga.2 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 18:13:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=yJMLaCiGghMWcptZS57yFzYbK44aJ3lqnIUCz4+4EeA=; b=unOVZuaXB9liA34Gc/SlFbTn/5+Il+7G7vuMIfcOy2BE6Bmfx6I+Jn08LEROHuOok9 DdnajRfWbY/z/oUAjzf9O69DpW+gWoDjoJwqIF3yJ7Mp+cWNvKuKPQQQholnuxfZ0MAz NHGaNbzH49dfk3Ghwdf2fqwe/1Ry0lFwgfenf6waejpRlq6BkpIC5tWh7qADdjvwU2bW NIk0BIBHn1oHRXPYWR9WM4RGfuNCFN0DkWaJxwdcMo622fI2YP0ZZDH105gydku6uxFQ 6zaAWO0K0z2Vm7nrufNWr5Ti+M9jt4OPyoDXJeZ4ZxoWvXT3TMMDEnqwgtqd1UKsnk8c k7vg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=yJMLaCiGghMWcptZS57yFzYbK44aJ3lqnIUCz4+4EeA=; b=EG9hP4YCrp3sjpdAmBpyHKvVIt5lGtFMXo7b0HnGSWaE/V1mWkwOObuoLSbidyK868 Ks0DbIKX5PzhOXf8Vi8k7XWlRtG3OchW0fupaC1/RbwGCZcP527u2WGIxxgB5u0fxOeo Q0nOz+OI4XCr6OybiOxlfOted9r//OuSqHPSuRZDcLedbjaXkDEE4WfNkisj5KEFi+Id 2WkmackZ06w3baCeloXL9QZbFdcn33xlcxTlMJdz91eoS8/q5IyPQ1VKJe392xrjkh/Z cLzUMqgGWadE3P3lf0XaNQ0z8L8Vqv5LytziQ8UxPIoguRVg2Y1ErnSokOUDM581zuNG S4yA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ohX4L8ja+kh3AoA0PuEeYS+kp8rwvtogREylfiyxCFmOfsoC4 nvKnX1/3sQC/9/WfKwW8ZZQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxF5MumAruuVYu3HE79g89SuTK3jLXd7unId9YzrN1gyPR1LA5qCXOo70/vXY+++oe3lXifhg== X-Received: by 2002:a63:fa07:: with SMTP id y7mr11157467pgh.213.1613441621049; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 18:13:41 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost (ip72-194-48-50.sb.sd.cox.net. [72.194.48.50]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h6sm10665309pfv.84.2021.02.15.18.13.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 15 Feb 2021 18:13:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87o8gl8afq.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::534; envelope-from=karthikchikmagalur@gmail.com; helo=mail-pg1-x534.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:264865 Archived-At: > Indirect clones and non-indirect clones are quite different. > > There is already a convention to use 'n' for a non-indirect clone -- see > M-n in Info-mode. I see, I was unaware of this. Thank you for letting me know. Do you also intend to bind `C-x x c' to `clone-indirect-buffer' then? Karthik