From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: igc, macOS avoiding signals Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2025 17:06:09 +0200 Message-ID: <86zfk6bov2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <799DDBC5-2C14-4476-B1E0-7BA2FE9E7901@toadstyle.org> <87msgdkt29.fsf@gmail.com> <86h66lnjrt.fsf@gnu.org> <868qrxnfrw.fsf@gnu.org> <87a5ccl2zx.fsf@gmail.com> <875xn0p3l1.fsf@protonmail.com> <86ldvwm190.fsf@gnu.org> <87cyh8nczh.fsf@protonmail.com> <867c7fncom.fsf@gnu.org> <87pll3ivzs.fsf@gmail.com> <87wmfaof1l.fsf@gmail.com> <868qrqd5oa.fsf@gnu.org> <87ed1iocgu.fsf@gmail.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37709"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: pipcet@protonmail.com, gerd.moellmann@gmail.com, spd@toadstyle.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Helmut Eller Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 04 16:07:01 2025 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tU5jx-0009fF-BJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 16:07:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tU5jI-0003sh-AT; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 10:06:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tU5jD-0003sQ-AF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 10:06:15 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tU5jC-0006cN-21; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 10:06:14 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=WSaYbeKAof0czLgwkx9nkvPIE3uv6OJ3vKIruEhusco=; b=GmlV5Wdj8vD3 MHIK17AYEua1Il+DnPGmF9Na5aaDdJ+tcPe0W8ZGM8C8XRrce9M8kYDjYSKJRuj4l3uiXtstaSApN TiPGQ/uqtFFmWMV+fMAOsa/Wyftzp72zHgOvZ4MQ4fsaldvzgcdNh8JpTXHmNnDlFp3zABaBmQoIa LbB+sYkj3ETT1RujshEVW/T+sKFUmyAO8sROIK4Oq5AOuZ0A8ChI4Kau7W6gv9w/wNkd2T/JDwGMz g9OdhcnPlPlBAhO5Fsi+5OP6ccDqejRXxacJ1Y+3pj4aQJz2dkULe6/HLRAIZ1zeGR4qkbzpVvcmz KnQ8Al0Xekv8QT3VyByJFg==; In-Reply-To: <87ed1iocgu.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Helmut Eller on Sat, 04 Jan 2025 15:55:29 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:327669 Archived-At: > From: Helmut Eller > Cc: pipcet@protonmail.com, gerd.moellmann@gmail.com, spd@toadstyle.org, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2025 15:55:29 +0100 > > On Sat, Jan 04 2025, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> WDYT? > > > > I'd make these extra calls only call the SIGPROF handler if the > > counter says some signals were missed. There's no need to affect > > other handlers without a good reason. > > If I had my way, I would merge Vquit_flag and pending_signals into a > word-sized bitset like so I don't mind, but do we need to test the other signals more frequently? They don't seem to be as urgent as SIGPROF, I think.