From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Multiple next-error sources Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2014 10:55:40 +0200 Message-ID: <86y4rmul4j.fsf@yandex.ru> References: <86fvdwgxqs.fsf@yandex.ru> <20141106180815.207bf7ad@forcix> <20141107104914.17f04967@forcix> <20141107165551.GA2865@acm.acm> <545CFD05.6060104@dancol.org> <20141107174029.GB2865@acm.acm> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1415436978 6458 80.91.229.3 (8 Nov 2014 08:56:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2014 08:56:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Daniel Colascione , Helmut Eller , Stefan Monnier , Jorgen Schaefer To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 08 09:56:11 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xn1oZ-0003st-2k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 09:56:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35290 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xn1oY-00073t-Oo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 03:56:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36136) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xn1oG-00073k-I6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 03:55:57 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xn1oB-0003sx-9p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 03:55:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wg0-x22a.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::22a]:37410) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xn1oB-0003sq-2q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 03:55:47 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id k14so5305336wgh.1 for ; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 00:55:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=GnorMhaZOoa1obbjya08wFM1dagtDIG/Fh8KqqCzCus=; b=Scbjc5NlX8lPj76Y7NwBXV20yCTayggNw2tvURK8mD36IAHqjXrUrRahsepbFyOeVI pL4s+/eu0ktQMusWxty/7qNpNGjwyGF4ATAU7MHhMdyr8rBENjYheuBUiA3tirNSj/Yo vu16Go6QWZM+pYlA/MJGOwantPhW45/G0ub8uPhyPbSHuddw5othMC/LWSiwQy5c8CcD fztFl4FCqnDACRWUFliPiy52liOzeIajgps2QeXoaH+rh1Lx3ZICS7Ti3nWXEyJ4IaWi Hto/T1onE81x23/h02PpdK5Ny/yOQr7Z+zNn+U/NkB4zRoZoT9+2HfqlXOFvScPBokHQ vMGQ== X-Received: by 10.180.103.33 with SMTP id ft1mr2317570wib.71.1415436946326; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 00:55:46 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from axl ([82.102.116.197]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id jw2sm4987142wid.3.2014.11.08.00.55.43 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 08 Nov 2014 00:55:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20141107174029.GB2865@acm.acm> (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:40:29 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.51 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c00::22a X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:176570 Archived-At: Alan Mackenzie writes: >> > (i) the danger (near certainty) that somebody is going to use `setq' >> > rather than `add-function' to configure it; > >> The same critique applies to regular hooks, doesn't it? > > :-) So it does! What I was confused about is foo-function. I think > this is going to be a defun in the future, whereas up to now it's always > been a defvar. Will it? In that case, it probably should be named differently, like foo-default (next-error-default, in the current example). As long as there is a foo-function custom var, the critique applies.