From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: MPS: Forwording symbols
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 19:29:59 +0300
Message-ID: <86y172p62g.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <m28qz5rzo0.fsf@pro2.fritz.box> <87jziod6yc.fsf@gmail.com>
 <m2sexcqlo0.fsf@pro2.fritz.box> <874j9rcuf6.fsf@gmail.com>
 <m2v827pg5s.fsf@pro2.fritz.box> <m2r0cvpfnn.fsf@pro2.fritz.box>
 <87y173bda9.fsf@gmail.com> <m2iky7pebl.fsf@pro2.fritz.box>
 <87plsfbcd5.fsf@gmail.com> <m2sexbmizc.fsf@pro2.fritz.box>
 <86cyoeqvfc.fsf@gnu.org> <87r0cu9q9h.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="19088"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: gerd.moellmann@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 18 18:30:59 2024
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1sJbjW-0004i3-Cg
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 18:30:58 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces@gnu.org>)
	id 1sJbif-00012r-1l; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 12:30:05 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1sJbid-00012H-BB
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 12:30:03 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1sJbid-0003RS-2K; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 12:30:03 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:
 Date; bh=d+ofNGu5yFjDhypqnTaRw7KBIrzFJ0GlR/3kBI5fmbc=; b=ItQ68bq8NhKhsfENfauc
 48NDz41qqV4VmPEM2G/4wPd4sXAbyypPyE5mw87barckD5705P5LcWnUBignwgTKcA9q3liguiFkT
 z1bJeN0gMGFOCJAv8wYkm6oqJcqBDqQrg215PCRS8pO/gjUtlEAUhtBJ5qt4r/grpSMbI7OVMks7y
 hSjV3Y5cpECTHKkgvqqF/GHqnWm+QbaYQM+8v0wt15wC7l1bTS4GyjV10RO+H8w8pZS79vQZ+4GI6
 bkxTElz7WArtNgVWk8Rll6jQoEeJD41NuKCm8nPxAdgPjkq2FWgxAH2FmWeIX1sq6qDzpSn3SFl97
 nagloXPtjnM6cg==;
In-Reply-To: <87r0cu9q9h.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Helmut Eller on Tue, 18
 Jun 2024 18:20:26 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:320245
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/320245>

> From: Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@gmail.com>
> Cc: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>,
>   emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 18:20:26 +0200
> 
> On Tue, Jun 18 2024, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> > Any ideas are welcome.  I will gladly provide more information if
> > needed.
> 
> The 32-bit build has two bignums in the dump.  Can you try this patch?

Thanks.  Unfortunately, it doesn't change what I see.  Same infinite
sequence of segfaults in the same place in the code.