From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is it worth it to add an extremely basic heex-mode and elixir-mode? Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 16:20:21 +0200 Message-ID: <86y0zxntga.fsf@gnu.org> References: Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14271"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Wilhelm Kirschbaum Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 30 15:21:08 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tSGdo-0003Yx-5Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 15:21:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tSGdC-0005ki-4k; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 09:20:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tSGdA-0005jo-01 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 09:20:28 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tSGd9-0001uA-OD; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 09:20:27 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=u1rnUDoeIcnyhZLVJUJGMiP9lP0bPH3xyncJRf4jiLU=; b=rG2pya4rNx7V 401qMLKLPQ5BSW6OuB1VIDVoKGxcFfEbyqZVILIqoT37pCLAD7rfg/eGuAW0ssK7EEx6yIM7ACDpS m5AQTK3zib3gRgglGRnyvtclCStBBQ85jRcFV2ljpZtwIK9/2cS3daWWM4yZxYXE31NjOXVvRwmef 6OBikieVpaQgkgh/LyTK9duCfI6qF4YxZxVuLLgIeb3+rqZGLCfN0wWnfVYkX7iRJk5Aw8QwTT2AM JyCdrYpQK4zqIEkUHlqJaVMm3vR11KUugyDmvnC6yAxdLSuDYVR6RZqhpocBevYeR9OIJE/KbM2VD hqFoNjh6sNsieNVo3YfE+Q==; In-Reply-To: (message from Wilhelm Kirschbaum on Mon, 30 Dec 2024 13:57:20 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:327425 Archived-At: > From: Wilhelm Kirschbaum > Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 13:57:20 +0200 > > There is currently a heex-ts-mode and elixir-ts-mode in Emacs, but no non-ts mode equivalents. There is > also an existing elixir-mode on MELPA https://github.com/elixir-editors/emacs-elixir but I think the > development on it has mostly been halted ( The conversations has dried up in the elixir forums at least ). > I don't see the existing elixir-mode going into Emacs, because there are quite a few issues and the work will > be more than the time I or anyone I know can free up. > > The reason why I added the elixir-ts-mode is to have a maintainable mode for Elixir developers to use out of > the box, this was after I tried to update the existing elixir-mode for almost a year without much success. > > Perhaps I can add a very basic heex- and elixir-mode so that people without the knowledge of how > tree-sitter works can have some benefit? Any thoughts on this? Feel free to work on such a mode, and thanks. Having a mode that doesn't need tree-sitter means more flexibility for users, so it is always welcome. However, whether the effort is justified (assuming it's non-trivial) is your call.