From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?andr=C3=A9s_ram=C3=ADrez?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs rendering comparisson between emacs23 and emacs26.3 Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 20:08:55 +0000 Organization: bien.comun.org Message-ID: <86wo74fdig.fsf@gmail.com> References: <86tv2h2vww.fsf@gmail.com> <20200322123818.GB32470@ACM> <87eetk5swm.fsf@gnu.org> <20200326193128.GC14092@ACM> <86d08y4zsx.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="107231"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: acm@muc.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 28 21:09:36 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jIHlw-000Rma-Gz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 21:09:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59646 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jIHlv-0008Fs-Ir for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 16:09:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51643) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jIHlQ-0007pz-I7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 16:09:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jIHlP-0008Tf-8k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 16:09:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qk1-x72e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::72e]:45233) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jIHlP-0008TJ-21; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 16:09:03 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qk1-x72e.google.com with SMTP id c145so14771820qke.12; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 13:09:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:organization:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=ywBoqO2Z3Mb6AZTH4OwC6xnNvCsBJYCe+vtStcE7PG8=; b=r0B3lv4V50haGy5G58sjAdY9EXoooXap0Qgr6eFepjJBBgXw2dwySE9Nw5Xd+VBf84 OJpCO3K3lb5czIkHDckpAZjVM0+4zJWEmVwe5tQHzs/OWT5eDBWURAsxOLwTRNVJq/mQ xylzUcYaZWYlajksL4wkj9pGNsJIrUPQStayWU1WLb3YnwrbFUllVMRFIxogU2UALI2T 0tgx96E4voiWvtRFP4TVChJ/Nwxm3n7UXQSXKF9i9Ry4EmfUQrydoSnXN9Zlg8kMY/oL KsHDThoUlOGdJDciJdjg31YOoe9wvSBCIYtYeAv3qB3TGsjdhq3ytbZb6B+JOPgFcfhJ pUGw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:organization :references:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=ywBoqO2Z3Mb6AZTH4OwC6xnNvCsBJYCe+vtStcE7PG8=; b=VS/AzK29bgtfejEDSa0h05bsL9nWjjDsM77D77Fs4Is3ITZRfffEOaPuf9kCBa2iO4 dnZtjlh+qj4o2QosEx1AtRpZs9+f5sEWAUFhSahJ6HWhYQNS5ykgJPnauUXPesPnTN0p 26rNV/DPMSyp3mk4jtDKKdZYpzrg3waCctKKGhLQXbiimvqi3KkKZVDGYkfkf3k+9Yce o9CEV1wEuprYTSohExyJ/JXghwrjKIaKw9Uk6h86AqLwoWhqf2rmPWeCbWj7TmB1aOVs XstEwm9JI1/qcEjY7WBmaszKkHRAyuLIXM1PS2Rifmv/dJTEtaEgjIvvttY1/NZ6NibI h1cw== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2xB/O5jig031bfT4qEiYP9DBqf8pdTVFBPv/MYaoyYBHPvdDh3 Mm7HCXlYl/5royQJX0VIQp2560I4 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vuqbvwHz5nyQZkSv9nkFhNhaeFn1mJOQ0YMXnwqaPzF7kin8WUQbGxGQhGn0iiSXtVEhvVrJg== X-Received: by 2002:ae9:efd1:: with SMTP id d200mr4779773qkg.79.1585426141731; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 13:09:01 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from sacsa.n800.arm.processor.yandex.fm ([190.236.255.22]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r29sm7184587qtj.76.2020.03.28.13.08.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 28 Mar 2020 13:09:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Attribution: INKA X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::72e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:245899 Archived-At: Hi Richard. Richard> To tell the people with the strongest commitment to freedom Richard> to use an old version of Emacs is to choose failure. We need Richard> to re-optimize the Emacs master so it gives good performance Richard> on those machines. We Agree on that. >> BTW. On my comparissons that variable was set no nil as Doc says: >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> If nil, use the default decoration (typically the minimum >> available). --8<---------------cut >> here---------------end--------------->8--- Also xdisp.c. Just load >> c-mode not c++-mode Richard> What were the results of the comparisons you did with this Richard> setting? (I wasn't following this topic until yesterday.) It was on the first email of this thread: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2020-03/msg00511.html --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Ulrich Mueller has a new comparisson with an up to date machine. On his comparisson he has it with font-lock enable and disable. I am going to do the same an update the table accordingly. --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2020-03/msg00724.html --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >> With the help of Michael Albinus I have update the emacs23 builtin >> tramp version to the latest one that supports GNU/Emacs23 Richard> Has Tramp become a lot slower? Or is it only that the Richard> current Tramp doesn't work on Emacs 23? Michael Albinus has answered on this email: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2020-03/msg00721.html --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Richard> Has Org mode become a lot slower? Or is it only that the Richard> current Org mode doesn't work on Emacs 23? Current org-mode does not work on Emacs23. But I remember You were part of that discussion in the past. And the conclusion of that discussion was to support just three versions. But the org-mode guys replied a shortage of man power for it. Best Regards