From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Joost Kremers Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is this a bug in while-let or do I missunderstand it? Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 16:32:27 +0100 Message-ID: <86wmh831tg.fsf@fastmail.fm> References: <86ldxrliau.fsf@gnu.org> <865xot2y1d.fsf@fastmail.fm> <86ldxoiqzr.fsf@gnu.org> <868qto7h8h.fsf@fastmail.fm> <86frnwikqc.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8235"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.7; emacs 29.4 Cc: arthur.miller@live.com, ams@gnu.org, yuri.v.khan@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 12 16:33:04 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tAst4-0001rE-SG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 12 Nov 2024 16:33:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tAssh-0005ZN-Cx; Tue, 12 Nov 2024 10:32:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tAsse-0005Z7-MH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Nov 2024 10:32:36 -0500 Original-Received: from fhigh-b1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([202.12.124.152]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tAssd-0006r8-1o; Tue, 12 Nov 2024 10:32:36 -0500 Original-Received: from phl-compute-02.internal (phl-compute-02.phl.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailfhigh.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A59DA2540152; Tue, 12 Nov 2024 10:32:32 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from phl-mailfrontend-02 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-02.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 12 Nov 2024 10:32:32 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1731425552; x=1731511952; bh=UV0NWwheKz dmdDFCOaYwWiYcCGQtmJROIW/jXgas/AY=; b=chPwx62T8yE8zfXb5fbVjgtZrX /c0KOfrsaJ4cJqHh+mQ5jCdsBDqLLCQFYsXcBgwv8JcqbBuP1VxWA0V8Z3MNsKvE Nn5xZF+/Jt7ti/sHhRzi6BhmFtVwIrNQYrPVQK/BInGm4nPxkicMOyDTE5OEWl2F FeegG2gEeBtaN8yk5diLDGEgeF/GrjMx07uIpWsz0Q3QCtuNXQYZGAnQ+C222dEp h2y1wuD4vFWs8OZ8YzDFX1XFtRMze7zjAQQYRqNytcKAmw8wuQ9nZopZMOFZ2H+J Z/WM8/UVaast4b7F5FeTyArGu2wc9KhZfKpitZMbSCCiwTRFxq+RidDp+fWQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t= 1731425552; x=1731511952; bh=UV0NWwheKzdmdDFCOaYwWiYcCGQtmJROIW/ jXgas/AY=; b=n6YW2liZMDCXtp1+hvTmAJ8P1f4CKwRhQS/ubtCc+gyc1EAWw76 Kc0QP94P4yKFUEaGaZ2/WgYIoEd4b6AaHXQpwRC7hhUpxQh8Z1FccG7Cks2KCj/v Nt12CgTCz5qVQK92iiinIBSGLQDiz6CDV/h9PFjVqZdvifSbdJd2+PxvDD3H3tSr vRTS7X8QNiSLi0LQ57OXxT14q/q2rooXRXugW/P7lnJ6nIOHA4+4+inz/iQJ+b4e 7U6+SdIhNeCcVM7d3681618Gy/6Mv7OE4lNrvOBN8V1o65vS+Ja008JyDQiKQkOY U5gho/u5aavlyzhvR4KrD905r7ZrQiC5ZAg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefuddrudeggdejgecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpuffr tefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnth hsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvfevufgjfhgffffkgggtsehttdertddtredtnecu hfhrohhmpeflohhoshhtucfmrhgvmhgvrhhsuceojhhoohhsthhkrhgvmhgvrhhssehfrg hsthhmrghilhdrfhhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeefkeejgffftdfgffejudeukeet heduhfevtefhhfehiefhledtgffhgeekiedvheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtne curfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehjohhoshhtkhhrvghmvghrshesfhgrshhtmhgr ihhlrdhfmhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohephedpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpth htohepvghmrggtshdquggvvhgvlhesghhnuhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopeihuhhrihdr vhdrkhhhrghnsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtoheprghmshesghhnuhdrohhrgh dprhgtphhtthhopegrrhhthhhurhdrmhhilhhlvghrsehlihhvvgdrtghomhdprhgtphht thhopegvlhhiiiesgh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: ie15541ac:Fastmail Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 12 Nov 2024 10:32:30 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <86frnwikqc.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 12 Nov 2024 16:34:51 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=202.12.124.152; envelope-from=joostkremers@fastmail.fm; helo=fhigh-b1-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:325429 Archived-At: On Tue, Nov 12 2024, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Since `while-let` is a bit more complex, I thought I'd add a similar >> explanation for it. I can try and shorten it, but I gather you think it >> should be removed altogether? > > Doesn't the part you quoted cover while-let* as well? To a degree, but `while-let*` has some peculiarities that aren't covered. Let me come up with a revised version and see what you think. -- Joost Kremers Life has its moments