From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Turning on/off tree-sitter modes Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2024 16:14:14 +0200 Message-ID: <86wmgg26rt.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86cyipsp94.fsf@gnu.org> <9cd17f8b-f88c-49f6-9024-0b6d297e18ac@gutov.dev> <867c8xsmri.fsf@gnu.org> <566ac897-ea5e-4141-bcb3-306d43c9118a@gutov.dev> <865xohrvfa.fsf@gnu.org> <86wmgwnyle.fsf@gnu.org> <178dfc7f-bc2d-4e3b-8417-a616ccc0eef3@gutov.dev> <86v7wgnxlz.fsf@gnu.org> <01d83ec8-c02b-4806-8764-38dc89a89125@gutov.dev> <86ttbzojho.fsf@gnu.org> <930f5c8e-1481-43a5-8f1d-2c13a98df74f@gutov.dev> <86r072krq5.fsf@gnu.org> <27a62624-387c-4233-b995-170270e26efd@gutov.dev> <86iks245q0.fsf@gnu.org> <86bjxt2avf.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30211"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: dmitry@gutov.dev, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 03 15:15:05 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tITg9-0007ic-AD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2024 15:15:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tITfR-0003LL-I7; Tue, 03 Dec 2024 09:14:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tITfP-0003L1-QQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2024 09:14:19 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tITfO-0005q7-Fu; Tue, 03 Dec 2024 09:14:18 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=AgH6TDyfpNRiq9OQBuO2YreyexOX7OTll1EubPAyJk4=; b=VaZWNExmCnvl MwhOkW0ZWziZcIi/E0Aq2jNMck7LlFehoLSfDkIIZcWXXtQPrn/P6lnxvrbU8JS2HEBIk399rQfYI B7rmGvk/iMZWzGEAs9cRX72A7siV0poWdwfLvaKEM2yGEjwQlmLrw6TPTlQIo1JAsf/WAWxYI0p7l uUF2pI1MfxVw6ykx0m+S+ABmKomzAgS7j0EqM6AgO4Kj1F0ZA+dEOtQZ7b3mC8igHJGTgORjBbL8C LoNORPvT2WijgYPlw/HH2t2at2swWbPBvrIYlPQVade3c3yOgaMqoro2rwPIspsNm73aK2hk/hayt CPpCMoyLJSz4HqCHBbFhnw==; In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Monnier on Tue, 03 Dec 2024 08:26:01 -0500) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:325989 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: dmitry@gutov.dev, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2024 08:26:01 -0500 > > >> Do you have a concrete example? > > > > cmake-ts-mode, dockerfile-ts-mode, elixir-ts-mode, lua-ts-mode, to > > name just a few. Basically any FOO-ts-mode for which we don't have a > > corresponding FOO-mode. > > Let's take the `cmake-ts-mode` as an example, then. > I consider it currently broken: > > emacs -Q foo.cmake > > should put you in `cmake-ts-mode` when you have the CMake > tree-sitter grammar installed, but instead it remains in > fundamental-mode. > > Until this is fixed I don't see any sense in discussing how the users > can specify whether they prefer `cmake-mode` or `cmake-ts-mode`. I think we are mis-communicating. This thread's Subject is "Turning on/off tree-sitter modes", so I'm asking: what we will tell users to to do if they want to turn ON cmake-ts-mode? Surely, the answer to that question should be part of the solution which we will agree upon as result of this discussion, right? I didn't mean to say anything about the imaginary cmake-mode, I meant to point out that it doesn't exist in Emacs, so our solution to this cannot be based solely on major-mode-remap-defaults/alist.