Re: master a427927123c 1/2: ; * src/lisp.h (struct Lisp_Subr): Fix comment.

Re: master a427927123c 1/2: ; * src/lisp.h (struct Lisp_Subr): Fix comment.

[Pip Cet via Emacs development discussions.]

"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

> branch: master
> commit a427927123cea5ddbf2f2edc1db69ec7d83f2d42
> Author: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> Commit: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
>
>     ; * src/lisp.h (struct Lisp_Subr): Fix comment.
> ---
>  src/lisp.h | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/lisp.h b/src/lisp.h
> index 4c09afc77e2..c93d4d15b33 100644
> --- a/src/lisp.h
> +++ b/src/lisp.h
> @@ -2228,8 +2228,8 @@ struct Lisp_Subr
>        Lisp_Object native;
>      } intspec;
>      Lisp_Object command_modes;
> -    /* positive values: offset into etc/DOC.  Negative values: one's
> +    /* Positive values: offset into etc/DOC.  Negative values: one's

Thanks!  Sorry about that.

> -       complement of index into the native comp unit's function
> +       complement of index into the native comp unit's function's
>         documentation vector.  */

Every native comp unit has a single vector, which contains its
functions' documentation strings.  It's shared between all functions, so
you can refer to it as the "function's documentation vector".

I didn't, because it sounds (to me) like a different vector is used for
each function.

Pip

Re: master a427927123c 1/2: ; * src/lisp.h (struct Lisp_Subr): Fix comment.

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2025 13:55:28 +0000
> From: Pip Cet <pipcet@protonmail.com>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> 
> "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > -       complement of index into the native comp unit's function
> > +       complement of index into the native comp unit's function's
> >         documentation vector.  */
> 
> Every native comp unit has a single vector, which contains its
> functions' documentation strings.  It's shared between all functions, so
> you can refer to it as the "function's documentation vector".
> 
> I didn't, because it sounds (to me) like a different vector is used for
> each function.

Thanks, I've now reworded that to make this clearer.