From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Image mode Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 08:13:42 +0100 Message-ID: <86veihqdp5.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> References: <87k5yxeg19.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1170659660 18320 80.91.229.12 (5 Feb 2007 07:14:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 07:14:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juri Linkov , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Juanma Barranquero" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 05 08:14:13 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HDy3I-0003Ai-AP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 08:14:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HDy3H-0007Yf-Pu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 02:14:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HDy37-0007Ya-L9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 02:14:01 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HDy35-0007YO-76 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 02:14:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HDy35-0007YL-1D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 02:13:59 -0500 Original-Received: from pc3.berlin.powerweb.de ([62.67.228.11]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HDy34-0005ot-Lh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 02:13:58 -0500 Original-Received: from quinscape.de (pd95b0fdb.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.91.15.219]) by pc3.berlin.powerweb.de (8.9.3p3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA29912 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2007 08:13:50 +0100 X-Delivered-To: Original-Received: (qmail 7084 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2007 07:13:55 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO lola.quinscape.zz) ([10.0.3.43]) (envelope-sender ) by ns.quinscape.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 5 Feb 2007 07:13:55 -0000 Original-Received: by lola.quinscape.zz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3A1E4C2ABC; Mon, 5 Feb 2007 08:13:42 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Mon\, 5 Feb 2007 00\:40\:46 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:65887 Archived-At: "Juanma Barranquero" writes: > On 2/4/07, Juri Linkov wrote: > >> Due to paranoid fears, a good feature was deteriorated to an unusable state. > > Yes, you're right, if you mean that adding this to .emacs is an almost > insurmountable burden: > > (put 'image-toggle-display 'disabled nil) > (setcdr (rassq 'image-mode-maybe magic-mode-alist) > 'image-mode) Actually, it is. The people most interested in painless image display will be completely unable to come up with something like that. The first line is not so much of a problem, since it is entered as a consequence of the "disabled" dialog by Emacs. But the second? -- David Kastrup