From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: meta-mode.el comment on font lock Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:25:38 +0200 Message-ID: <86veai35l9.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> References: <46E53D71.2000201@gmail.com> <87tzq2ehaz.fsf@cadilhac.name> <46E55E97.1050603@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189442442 5377 80.91.229.12 (10 Sep 2007 16:40:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:40:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Micha=EBl?= Cadilhac , Emacs Devel To: "Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 11 02:40:29 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IUsdQ-0005Kj-9l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 01:25:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IUl93-0007cR-Np for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 11:25:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IUl8z-0007bX-Je for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 11:25:45 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IUl8w-0007a8-0a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 11:25:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IUl8v-0007Zt-JK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 11:25:41 -0400 Original-Received: from pc3.berlin.powerweb.de ([62.67.228.11]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IUl8v-0006ZE-1m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 11:25:41 -0400 Original-Received: from quinscape.de (dslnet.212-29-44.ip210.dokom.de [212.29.44.210] (may be forged)) by pc3.berlin.powerweb.de (8.9.3p3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA03107 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:25:30 +0200 X-Delivered-To: Original-Received: (qmail 12489 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2007 15:25:38 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO lola.quinscape.zz) ([10.0.3.43]) (envelope-sender ) by ns.quinscape.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 10 Sep 2007 15:25:38 -0000 Original-Received: by lola.quinscape.zz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 118BD8F8ED; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:25:38 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <46E55E97.1050603@gmail.com> (Lennart Borgman's message of "Mon\, 10 Sep 2007 17\:11\:19 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:78464 Archived-At: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" writes: > Micha=EBl Cadilhac wrote: >> "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" writes: >> >>> I think the comments about font lock in meta-mode.el needs some >>> updating. >> >> What do you suggest? Talking about jit? Deleting the comment? > > It looks to me like the whole comment should be deleted, but Stefan > suggested just removing the lazy-lock bit. An alternative is to > clearly state that the portion I pasted is for versions of Emacs older > than 22. I am not sure what the situation for XEmacs would be, but I don't think leaving a comment in for which we don't even know whether or not it might possibly apply makes sense. So I'd vote for throwing out the whole comment. --=20 David Kastrup