From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Moving image commands to one submap Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2022 21:36:12 +0300 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <86v8pc7gab.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <87zgeq3xuu.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3423"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 24 20:58:14 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ocALu-0000la-ER for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2022 20:58:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44612 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ocALt-0002SO-5Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2022 14:58:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59510) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ocAL6-0001jk-Ks for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2022 14:57:24 -0400 Original-Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:dc4:8::222]:47807) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ocAL4-0006wf-VN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2022 14:57:24 -0400 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B394E40003; Sat, 24 Sep 2022 18:57:16 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87zgeq3xuu.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Fri, 23 Sep 2022 17:38:01 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:4b98:dc4:8::222; envelope-from=juri@linkov.net; helo=relay2-d.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:296177 Archived-At: > When the image keymap was introduced, it only had a couple of commands, > so triggering something by accident wasn't a major worry. But it's now > grown a large number of bindings, so people are hitting these commands > more by accident. > > So I think we should move them all under one prefix, to make this less > likely, and also then make the applicable commands use repeat-map. For > instance, `+ + +' would become ` + + +' etc (to increase the > size of an image). > > But what should be? Something with "image" mnemonics and > simple to type, but `C-i' isn't an option (because of confusion with > `TAB'). I can't imagine a need to use self-inserting keys while point is on an image. So why not just 'i' and then the image keymap with '+ - + - ...' Or the same keymap directly without 'i'.