From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Possible minibuffer completion enhancements Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 09:50:45 +0200 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <86v87l4xii.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10293"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/30.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: Stefan Kangas , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eshel Yaron Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 22 08:56:45 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rRpAi-0002TF-Mo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 08:56:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rRp9k-0004VO-RO; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 02:55:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rRp9j-0004V9-Cu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 02:55:43 -0500 Original-Received: from relay8-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.201]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rRp9h-0005Yy-Nf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 02:55:43 -0500 Original-Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D848F1BF206; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 07:55:38 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: (Eshel Yaron's message of "Sun, 21 Jan 2024 10:03:54 +0100") X-GND-Sasl: juri@linkov.net Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.183.201; envelope-from=juri@linkov.net; helo=relay8-d.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:315206 Archived-At: > I've rebased the feature/minibuffer-completion-enhancements branch on > top of the current master, and pushed it to emacs.git. Looking forward > for your thoughts and feedback! Thanks, I tried 'C-x C-v' (minibuffer-sort-completions), and it works nicely. But I can't imagine how the whole branch could be merged to master when it contains so diverse set of different features. For example, probably everyone would agree that 'completion-table-with-metadata' could be installed in master immediately (if you present a separate patch). But other feature might require more discussion.