From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug? Date: Wed, 03 May 2023 20:22:30 +0300 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <86ttwtwe5t.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <875y9aciir.fsf.ref@yahoo.com> <875y9aciir.fsf@yahoo.com> <9DC42D1F-2061-48ED-932B-9704538356C8@acm.org> <380B9B5B-9FB9-4A99-830B-117A33519D3A@acm.org> <44D75AFF-BA98-4189-8E20-3138FE6A2231@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28252"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/30.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: Shynur Xie , emacs-devel , Po Lu To: Mattias =?iso-8859-1?Q?Engdeg=E5rd?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 03 19:35:26 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1puGNx-00077a-Li for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 May 2023 19:35:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1puGN9-0006Ax-JL; Wed, 03 May 2023 13:34:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1puGMs-0006A3-4t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 May 2023 13:34:24 -0400 Original-Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:dc4:8::225]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1puGMo-00033D-G3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 May 2023 13:34:16 -0400 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 130791C0003; Wed, 3 May 2023 17:34:08 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <44D75AFF-BA98-4189-8E20-3138FE6A2231@acm.org> ("Mattias =?iso-8859-1?Q?Engdeg=E5rd=22's?= message of "Wed, 3 May 2023 14:27:37 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:4b98:dc4:8::225; envelope-from=juri@linkov.net; helo=relay5-d.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:305794 Archived-At: >>> Don't we have an existing suitable face to inherit from? >> >> Do you mean to inherit from those faces that set colors separately for >> light and dark backgrounds? > > Yes, and it's much easier for the user to customise a single > "highlight" face than dozens of them. There is a face literally named > "highlight"; would that do? If so, maybe we don't even need a new > face at all. When the 'highlight' face is used, then no need to remove font-lock properties. The highlighted paren with the green background is clearly seen among font-lock faces.