From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: An anonymous IRC user's opinion Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 13:39:41 +0300 Message-ID: <86ttdgthg2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87plodsjsd.fsf@web.de> <865xq14dwp.fsf@gnu.org> <343c4d04-af53-4da2-9d1c-c616c74821e1@gutov.dev> <86plo8369c.fsf@gnu.org> <63edeeea-1f24-4d3b-abc8-b96b164942e4@gutov.dev> <8634l1zsej.fsf@gnu.org> <9a8b97f8-def3-43ce-b71b-1f09bb05afd4@gutov.dev> <86cyk4vcld.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2553"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: johan.myreen@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 13 12:40:45 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1szw1j-0000Nb-MV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 13 Oct 2024 12:40:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1szw0p-00007d-NO; Sun, 13 Oct 2024 06:39:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1szw0n-00006w-G4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Oct 2024 06:39:45 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1szw0m-0000Mf-PJ; Sun, 13 Oct 2024 06:39:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=rBv3HrDmUW6TsRUZT3hraDIQhBEMKo0u/uhyopgvGBU=; b=aiI39rxHJJVr A9UdCwL5hWCOHtFuEa78JfYtxN/cHeUdsdrpEFczkonQSu53EImYynfjPgO9mkPCkK71Na9dYsbbF JKO+o6+uuN81999dSlOU2giG44BUQW6NjDy37gB57UiwTuvNvN/9Lnie2JuI0HUkxzbLvpbhB/8AU FNkSmDJoL2bskOCgl1A+eUrI5hfsOW4hyHe85zdw11b/GzgKIMQ6SU70iVDERXWTf7dMNsBpRFjhH chn3i1gaqK3aUyHlZph1S+vt6l6jtZCPVixQdW+0soB+ZC0eqM+I5Tjjkh1DrRnEX6IScoHm9BRv2 WuoFWinWhEEl6EEy1KcFFQ==; In-Reply-To: (message from Dmitry Gutov on Sun, 13 Oct 2024 12:37:38 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:324543 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 12:37:38 +0300 > Cc: johan.myreen@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > > > It is not clear which modes you suggest that should behave like that. > > Surely, not all of them, i.e. including those for which non-TS modes > > are part of Emacs? > > I don't have a strong opinion on which set should be enabled - maybe > just all TS modes which we don't have built-in counterparts. Maybe not > even toml-ts-mode, since there is conf-toml-mode. > > Maybe make some exceptions for TS modes that provide significantly > better functionality than the classic ones. I tend to agree. > What I think is important, though, is avoiding major mode functions > modiying auto-mode-alist at runtime. But CC Mode already does, and always did? > > And yes, I would like to hear from more people what they think about > > the possible behaviors in these cases, including how to handle missing > > grammar libraries. > > Everybody's welcome to chime in. Right.