From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai Grossjohann Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: define-generic-mode: unexpected handling of comment-end Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 10:54:23 +0100 Message-ID: <86sm6ygsog.fsf@ketchup.de.uu.net> References: <86u0rfk2aa.fsf@ketchup.de.uu.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1101376737 26764 80.91.229.6 (25 Nov 2004 09:58:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 09:58:57 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 25 10:58:49 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CXGOm-00079F-00 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2004 10:58:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CXGXy-0001ee-13 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Nov 2004 05:08:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CXGUG-00017Z-GO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Nov 2004 05:04:28 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CXGU8-000169-2K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Nov 2004 05:04:20 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CXGU6-00015N-Mo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Nov 2004 05:04:19 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=main.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CXGKr-0001Z9-OZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Nov 2004 04:54:45 -0500 Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CXGKm-0007jU-00 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2004 10:54:40 +0100 Original-Received: from ketchup.de.uu.net ([139.4.38.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2004 10:54:40 +0100 Original-Received: from kai by ketchup.de.uu.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2004 10:54:40 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 9 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ketchup.de.uu.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:6ewuy8H/oDj547vlQe6rB2YoDcw= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:30341 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:30341 Stefan Monnier writes: > Well, the documentation suggests that the accepted values are the same as > the ones for comment-end, so the empty string should be accepted. Does the > following patch fix it for you? Yes, that works nicely. Thanks! Kai