From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Frank Haun Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Can we go GTK-only? Date: 27 Oct 2016 21:08:32 -0000 Organization: nil Message-ID: <86shrhts65.fsf@m8000.fhaun.de> References: <24db2975-17ca-ad01-20c8-df12071fa89a@dancol.org> <8637jhv9i7.fsf@m8000.fhaun.de> <5BD9D5CC-FE36-4935-AA76-5FA781088ECB@dancol.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1477602649 11586 195.159.176.226 (27 Oct 2016 21:10:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 21:10:49 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 27 23:10:46 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bzrwS-0000Q9-U1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 23:10:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44604 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bzrwV-0003yN-EA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 17:10:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59897) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bzrwM-0003yI-IP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 17:10:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bzrwJ-0007uw-Dz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 17:10:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=60946 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bzrwJ-0007uL-6o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 17:10:19 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bzrw9-0006iw-TF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 23:10:09 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 21 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:uSKtPVVyuh0kvH0Dijvn3I+PI54= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:208897 Archived-At: On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:45:23 -0700, Daniel Colascione wrote: > On October 27, 2016 1:05:50 PM PDT, Frank Haun wrote: >>On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:54:39 -0700, Daniel Colascione wrote: >> >>> Do many people really build Emacs as a Motif application? >> >>I knew a lot of people using: >> >> --with-x-toolkit=lucid >> >>Me too. Better performance on slow hardware and no problems with Emacs >>as daemon. > > I'm not proposing that we get rid of the lucid X support, but I agree > with Paul that we should rip GTK out of the X subsystem and make it a > peer of NS and Windows. Ah ok, thanks for clarification. Frank